Dentistry Department, East Jeddah Hospital, Ministry of Health, 22253 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jul;48(4):149-159. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.088. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
This clinical trial aimed to evaluate and compare the retention and cariostatic effects of hydrophilic and hydrophobic resin-based sealants (RBSs) for sealing pits and fissures in the permanent molars of uncooperative children. A split-mouth and double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted among 6- to 9-year-old uncooperative children. One hundred and four sound mandibular and maxillary first permanent molars were randomly allocated to be sealed with group I (UltraSeal XT® hydro™) or group II (Helioseal-F) in 34 uncooperative children. Clinical evaluation was performed by two investigators using the Color, Coverage and Caries system to assess sealant retention and cariostatic effect at 3-, 6- and 12-month intervals. Data analysis was performed using Friedman's and Mann-Whitney U tests. The final analysis included 31 children with 49 pairs of teeth. No significant differences were observed between the retention and cariostatic effects of hydrophilic and hydrophobic RBSs at the 3-, 6- and 12-month intervals ( = 0.23, = 0.638, and = 0.706, respectively) ( = 0.175, = 0.065, and = 0.171, respectively). After 12 months of follow-up, the hydrophilic RBSs showed an outcome equivalent to that of conventional hydrophobic RBSs in terms of retention and cariostatic effects. Therefore, hydrophilic RBSs could be considered as the sealing material of choice when isolation is difficult, particularly in uncooperative children.
本临床试验旨在评估和比较亲水性和疏水性树脂基封闭剂(RBS)在密封不合作儿童恒磨牙窝沟中的保留率和防龋效果。采用分口、双盲随机临床试验(RCT),对 6-9 岁不合作儿童进行研究。将 104 颗无龋下颌和上颌第一恒磨牙随机分为 I 组(UltraSeal XT® hydro™)或 II 组(Helioseal-F),每组 34 颗。由两名研究者使用 Color、Coverage 和 Caries 系统进行临床评估,以评估 3、6 和 12 个月时的封闭剂保留率和防龋效果。采用 Friedman 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行数据分析。最终分析包括 31 名儿童的 49 对牙齿。在 3、6 和 12 个月时,亲水性和疏水性 RBS 的保留率和防龋效果均无显著差异( = 0.23、 = 0.638 和 = 0.706; = 0.175、 = 0.065 和 = 0.171)。随访 12 个月后,亲水性 RBS 在保留率和防龋效果方面与传统疏水性 RBS 相当。因此,当隔离困难时,特别是在不合作儿童中,亲水性 RBS 可以作为封闭材料的首选。