• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定量构效关系(QSAR)模型用于预测(生态)毒理学终点的适用性判断。

Determination of "fitness-for-purpose" of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict (eco-)toxicological endpoints for regulatory use.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.

University of Tennessee, College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, TN, 37996-4500, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Jul;123:104956. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104956. Epub 2021 May 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104956
PMID:33979632
Abstract

In silico models are used to predict toxicity and molecular properties in chemical safety assessment, gaining widespread regulatory use under a number of legislations globally. This study has rationalised previously published criteria to evaluate quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) in terms of their uncertainty, variability and potential areas of bias, into ten assessment components, or higher level groupings. The components have been mapped onto specific regulatory uses (i.e. data gap filling for risk assessment, classification and labelling, and screening and prioritisation) identifying different levels of uncertainty that may be acceptable for each. Twelve published QSARs were evaluated using the components, such that their potential use could be identified. High uncertainty was commonly observed with the presentation of data, mechanistic interpretability, incorporation of toxicokinetics and the relevance of the data for regulatory purposes. The assessment components help to guide strategies that can be implemented to improve acceptability of QSARs through the reduction of uncertainties. It is anticipated that model developers could apply the assessment components from the model design phase (e.g. through problem formulation) through to their documentation and use. The application of the components provides the possibility to assess QSARs in a meaningful manner and demonstrate their fitness-for-purpose against pre-defined criteria.

摘要

在计算机安全评估中,人们利用计算机模型来预测毒性和分子特性,这一方法已在全球多项法规下得到了广泛的监管应用。本研究对之前发布的评估标准进行了合理化,根据其不确定性、可变性和潜在偏差领域,将其分为十个评估部分,或更高级别的分组。这些组成部分已映射到特定的监管用途(即风险评估、分类和标签、筛选和优先级划分的数据缺口填补),确定了每个用途可接受的不同不确定性水平。使用这些组成部分评估了十二个已发表的定量构效关系(QSAR),以确定其潜在用途。数据呈现、机制可解释性、纳入毒代动力学以及数据与监管用途的相关性等方面通常存在高度不确定性。评估组成部分有助于指导通过降低不确定性来提高 QSAR 可接受性的策略。预计模型开发人员可以从模型设计阶段(例如通过问题制定)到文档编制和使用阶段应用评估组成部分。应用这些组成部分可以以有意义的方式评估 QSAR,并根据预定义标准证明其适用性。

相似文献

1
Determination of "fitness-for-purpose" of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict (eco-)toxicological endpoints for regulatory use.定量构效关系(QSAR)模型用于预测(生态)毒理学终点的适用性判断。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Jul;123:104956. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104956. Epub 2021 May 9.
2
Identification and description of the uncertainty, variability, bias and influence in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for toxicity prediction.定量构效关系(QSAR)用于毒性预测中的不确定性、变异性、偏差和影响的识别和描述。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;106:90-104. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
3
Best Practices for QSAR Model Reporting: Physical and Chemical Properties, Ecotoxicity, Environmental Fate, Human Health, and Toxicokinetics Endpoints.QSAR 模型报告的最佳实践:物理化学性质、生态毒性、环境 fate、人类健康和毒代动力学终点。
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Dec;126(12):126001. doi: 10.1289/EHP3264.
4
Uncertainty in QSAR predictions.QSAR 预测中的不确定性。
Altern Lab Anim. 2013 Mar;41(1):111-25. doi: 10.1177/026119291304100111.
5
Essential and desirable characteristics of ecotoxicity quantitative structure-activity relationships.生态毒性定量构效关系的基本特征与理想特征。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Mar;22(3):599-607.
6
Guidance for good practice in the application of machine learning in development of toxicological quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs).机器学习在毒理学定量构效关系(QSARs)开发中的应用良好实践指南。
PLoS One. 2023 May 10;18(5):e0282924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282924. eCollection 2023.
7
QSAR Use in REACH Analyses of Alternatives to Predict Human Health and Environmental Toxicity of Alternative Chemical Substances.在替代物质的 REACH 分析中使用定量构效关系来预测替代化学物质对人类健康和环境的毒性。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2020 Sep;16(5):745-760. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4264. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
8
Classification of baseline toxicants for QSAR predictions to replace fish acute toxicity studies.用于替代鱼类急性毒性研究的定量构效关系预测的基线毒物分类。
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2017 Mar 22;19(3):429-437. doi: 10.1039/c6em00600k.
9
Arguments for considering uncertainty in QSAR predictions in hazard and risk assessments.考虑在危害和风险评估中对定量构效关系预测的不确定性。
Altern Lab Anim. 2013 Mar;41(1):91-110. doi: 10.1177/026119291304100110.
10
Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs.基于分类和回归的定量构效关系(QSAR)的可靠性和不确定性评估方法以及适用性评估方法。
Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Aug;111(10):1361-75. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5758.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive reexamination of the acute toxicity of nitrogen mustards: HN-1, HN-2 and HN-3 as blister agents: application of multi in silico approach.氮芥类(HN-1、HN-2和HN-3)作为发泡剂的急性毒性综合再研究:多种计算机模拟方法的应用
Arch Toxicol. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04105-0.
2
Relevance of kinetic interactions and co-formulants for plant protection product liver toxicity in vitro.动力学相互作用和共配方成分对植物保护产品体外肝毒性的相关性。
Arch Toxicol. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04071-7.
3
Guidance for good practice in the application of machine learning in development of toxicological quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs).
机器学习在毒理学定量构效关系(QSARs)开发中的应用良好实践指南。
PLoS One. 2023 May 10;18(5):e0282924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282924. eCollection 2023.
4
Construction of an In Silico Structural Profiling Tool Facilitating Mechanistically Grounded Classification of Aquatic Toxicants.构建一个计算结构特征分析工具,促进基于机制的水生毒物分类。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Dec 20;56(24):17805-17814. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c03736. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
5
Quantitative Structure-Toxicity Relationship in Bioactive Molecules from a Conceptual DFT Perspective.从概念性密度泛函理论视角看生物活性分子中的定量结构-毒性关系
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Nov 10;15(11):1383. doi: 10.3390/ph15111383.
6
A scheme to evaluate structural alerts to predict toxicity - Assessing confidence by characterising uncertainties.一种评估结构警示以预测毒性的方案 - 通过描述不确定性来评估置信度。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Nov;135:105249. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105249. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
7
Multi-Strategy Assessment of Different Uses of QSAR under REACH Analysis of Alternatives to Advance Information Transparency.多策略评估 QSAR 在 REACH 分析替代方法中的不同用途,以提高信息透明度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 4;19(7):4338. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074338.