• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替考拉宁与β-内酰胺类药物治疗葡萄球菌样菌血症发热患者:重点关注耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症。

Teicoplanin versus β-lactam for febrile patients with Staphylococcus-like bacteremia: focus on methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao Sung District, Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan.

Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2021 May 12;21(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06111-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-021-06111-w
PMID:33980167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8117599/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many studies have shown that vancomycin is inferior to β-lactam antibiotics in terms of effectiveness in the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. However, limited data are available regarding the comparison of clinical outcomes between patients receiving initial teicoplanin and those receiving β-lactam antibiotics for MSSA bacteremia.

METHODS

Eighty-four adults with MSSA bacteremia were included: initial teicoplanin treatment group (n = 28) and β-lactam treatment group (n = 56). The two groups were further stratified based on propensity score matching according to the outcome analysis using a logistic regression model. We investigated the clinical outcomes between the groups before and after propensity score matching after treatment completion.

RESULTS

Pittsburgh bacteremia score ≥ 4 (odds ratio, 60.6; 95%CI, 7.4-496.8) was an independent risk factor for unfavorable outcome. After propensity score matching, the initial teicoplanin treatment group and the β-lactam treatment group consisted of 28 patients each. No statistically significant differences were observed in the proportions of patients with favorable outcomes and 30-day overall mortality rates between the groups before and after propensity score matching after the completion of teicoplanin or β-lactam treatment. The Kaplan-Meier 30-day survival curve also showed no significant difference between the patients receiving initial teicoplanin treatment and those receiving β-lactam treatment before and after matching (hazard ratio, 1.84, 95%CI, 0.60-5.64; and 3.12, 95%CI, 0.98-9.99, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant difference in clinical outcomes between initial teicoplanin treatment and β-lactam treatment among patients with MSSA bacteremia. Pittsburgh bacteremia score ≥ 4 was a significant risk factor for mortality.

摘要

背景

许多研究表明,万古霉素在治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)菌血症方面的疗效不如β-内酰胺类抗生素。然而,关于初始使用替考拉宁与β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗 MSSA 菌血症的患者临床结局比较的数据有限。

方法

纳入 84 例 MSSA 菌血症成人患者:初始替考拉宁治疗组(n=28)和β-内酰胺治疗组(n=56)。根据结局分析,使用逻辑回归模型进行倾向性评分匹配后,将两组进一步分层。我们研究了治疗完成后,在倾向性评分匹配前后两组之间的临床结局。

结果

匹兹堡菌血症评分≥4(优势比,60.6;95%置信区间,7.4-496.8)是不良结局的独立危险因素。经过倾向性评分匹配后,替考拉宁初始治疗组和β-内酰胺治疗组各包含 28 例患者。在替考拉宁或β-内酰胺治疗完成后,倾向性评分匹配前后,两组患者的良好结局比例和 30 天总死亡率均无统计学差异。Kaplan-Meier 30 天生存曲线也显示,在匹配前后,接受初始替考拉宁治疗和接受β-内酰胺治疗的患者之间无显著差异(风险比,1.84,95%置信区间,0.60-5.64;和 3.12,95%置信区间,0.98-9.99)。

结论

在 MSSA 菌血症患者中,初始替考拉宁治疗与β-内酰胺治疗的临床结局无显著差异。匹兹堡菌血症评分≥4 是死亡的显著危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/170f/8117599/ab8ec4d01ee8/12879_2021_6111_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/170f/8117599/3ee8e99a7812/12879_2021_6111_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/170f/8117599/a5f09e8cdc37/12879_2021_6111_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/170f/8117599/ab8ec4d01ee8/12879_2021_6111_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/170f/8117599/3ee8e99a7812/12879_2021_6111_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/170f/8117599/a5f09e8cdc37/12879_2021_6111_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/170f/8117599/ab8ec4d01ee8/12879_2021_6111_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Teicoplanin versus β-lactam for febrile patients with Staphylococcus-like bacteremia: focus on methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.替考拉宁与β-内酰胺类药物治疗葡萄球菌样菌血症发热患者:重点关注耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 May 12;21(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06111-w.
2
Comparison of outcomes in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia who are treated with β-lactam vs vancomycin empiric therapy: a retrospective cohort study.对接受β-内酰胺类药物与万古霉素经验性治疗的甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)菌血症患者的治疗结果比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 May 23;16:224. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1564-5.
3
Comparative effectiveness of β-lactam versus vancomycin empiric therapy in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia.β-内酰胺类与万古霉素经验性治疗对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)菌血症患者的疗效比较
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2016 Apr 26;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s12941-016-0143-3.
4
Outcome of vancomycin treatment in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者的万古霉素治疗结果
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Jan;52(1):192-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00700-07. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
5
Impact of β-Lactam and Daptomycin Combination Therapy on Clinical Outcomes in Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.β-内酰胺与达托霉素联合治疗对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症临床结局的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 15;69(9):1480-1488. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz018.
6
Early Administration of Adjuvant β-Lactam Therapy in Combination with Vancomycin among Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection: A Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis.早期辅助β-内酰胺类药物联合万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染患者:一项回顾性、多中心分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Nov;37(11):1347-1356. doi: 10.1002/phar.2034. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
The empirical combination of vancomycin and a β-lactam for Staphylococcal bacteremia.万古霉素与β-内酰胺类药物联合治疗葡萄球菌菌血症的经验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;57(12):1760-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit560. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
8
Outcomes of Vancomycin plus a β-Lactam versus Vancomycin Only for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.万古霉素联合β-内酰胺类药物与万古霉素单药治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的结局比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01554-17. Print 2018 Feb.
9
Comparative effectiveness of nafcillin or cefazolin versus vancomycin in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者中使用萘夫西林或头孢唑林与万古霉素的疗效比较。
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Oct 19;11:279. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-279.
10
Clinical Outcomes of Daptomycin Versus Anti-Staphylococcal Beta-Lactams in Definitive Treatment of Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.达托霉素与抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类药物在治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染中的临床结局比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Aug;58(2):106363. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106363. Epub 2021 May 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal teicoplanin loading regimen to rapidly achieve target trough plasma concentration in critically ill patients.优化替考拉宁负荷剂量方案以快速达到危重症患者的目标谷浓度。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2020 Mar;126(3):277-288. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13338. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin in febrile neutropenic patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.在接受造血干细胞移植的发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中,万古霉素与替考拉宁的疗效和安全性比较。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Dec;44(6):888-894. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13011. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Evaluating the optimal dose of teicoplanin with therapeutic drug monitoring: not too high for adverse event, not too low for treatment efficacy.
治疗药物监测指导下评估替考拉宁的最佳剂量:过高易发生不良反应,过低则疗效不佳。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;38(11):2113-2120. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03652-6. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
4
Daptomycin versus teicoplanin for bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant with a high teicoplanin minimal inhibitory concentration ≥1.5 mg/L: a propensity score-based analysis.达托霉素与替考拉宁治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染且替考拉宁最低抑菌浓度≥1.5mg/L:基于倾向评分的分析
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Oct 26;11:2011-2020. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S184411. eCollection 2018.
5
Impact of teicoplanin maintenance dose and MIC values on the clinical outcomes of patients treated for methicillin-resistant bacteremia.替考拉宁维持剂量和最低抑菌浓度值对耐甲氧西林菌血症患者临床结局的影响。
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Aug 15;11:1205-1217. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S171236. eCollection 2018.
6
Retrospective analysis of relationships among the dose regimen, trough concentration, efficacy, and safety of teicoplanin in Chinese patients with moderate-severe Gram-positive infections.替考拉宁在中国中重度革兰氏阳性感染患者中给药方案、谷浓度、疗效及安全性之间关系的回顾性分析
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Jan 5;11:29-36. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S146961. eCollection 2018.
7
Teicoplanin therapy for MRSA bacteraemia: a retrospective study emphasizing the importance of maintenance dosing in improving clinical outcomes.替考拉宁治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症:一项强调维持剂量在改善临床结局方面重要性的回顾性研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Jan;70(1):257-63. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku335. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
8
The empirical combination of vancomycin and a β-lactam for Staphylococcal bacteremia.万古霉素与β-内酰胺类药物联合治疗葡萄球菌菌血症的经验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;57(12):1760-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit560. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
9
Antibiotic consumption and healthcare-associated infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli at a large medical center in Taiwan from 2002 to 2009: implicating the importance of antibiotic stewardship.2002 年至 2009 年台湾一家大型医疗中心耐多药革兰氏阴性杆菌所致抗生素使用与医疗相关感染:提示抗生素管理的重要性。
PLoS One. 2013 May 30;8(5):e65621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065621. Print 2013.
10
Persistent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a prospective analysis of risk factors, outcomes, and microbiologic and genotypic characteristics of isolates.持续性金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症:对危险因素、结局以及分离株的微生物学和基因型特征的前瞻性分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2013 Mar;92(2):98-108. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e318289ff1e.