Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
J Neurosci. 2021 Jun 23;41(25):5453-5470. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0223-21.2021. Epub 2021 May 12.
Dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNC) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) exhibit spontaneous firing activity. The dopaminergic neurons in these regions have been shown to exhibit differential sensitivity to neuronal loss and psychostimulants targeting dopamine transporter. However, it remains unclear whether these regional differences scale beyond individual neuronal activity to regional neuronal networks. Here, we used live-cell calcium imaging to show that network connectivity greatly differs between SNC and VTA regions with higher incidence of hub-like neurons in the VTA. Specifically, the frequency of hub-like neurons was significantly lower in SNC than in the adjacent VTA, consistent with the interpretation of a lower network resilience to SNC neuronal loss. We tested this hypothesis, in DAT-cre/loxP-GCaMP6f mice of either sex, when activity of an individual dopaminergic neuron is suppressed, through whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology, in either SNC or VTA networks. Neuronal loss in the SNC increased network clustering, whereas the larger number of hub-neurons in the VTA overcompensated by decreasing network clustering in the VTA. We further show that network properties are regulatable via a dopamine transporter but not a D2 receptor dependent mechanism. Our results demonstrate novel regulatory mechanisms of functional network topology in dopaminergic brain regions. In this work, we begin to untangle the differences in complex network properties between the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNC) and VTA, that may underlie differential sensitivity between regions. The methods and analysis employed provide a springboard for investigations of network topology in multiple deep brain structures and disorders.
黑质致密部(SNC)和腹侧被盖区(VTA)的多巴胺能神经元表现出自发的放电活动。这些区域的多巴胺能神经元对神经元丢失和针对多巴胺转运体的精神兴奋剂表现出不同的敏感性。然而,尚不清楚这些区域差异是否会超越单个神经元活动而扩展到区域神经元网络。在这里,我们使用活细胞钙成像技术表明,SNC 和 VTA 区域之间的网络连接性存在很大差异,VTA 中具有更高发生率的枢纽样神经元。具体而言,SNC 中的枢纽样神经元频率明显低于 VTA,与 SNC 神经元丢失导致网络弹性降低的解释一致。我们在雄性或雌性 DAT-cre/loxP-GCaMP6f 小鼠中测试了这一假说,通过全细胞膜片钳电生理学抑制单个多巴胺能神经元的活动,无论是在 SNC 还是 VTA 网络中。SNC 中的神经元丢失增加了网络聚类,而 VTA 中更多的枢纽神经元通过降低 VTA 中的网络聚类来过度补偿。我们进一步表明,网络特性可通过多巴胺转运体调节,但不能通过 D2 受体依赖性机制调节。我们的研究结果证明了多巴胺能脑区功能网络拓扑的新型调节机制。在这项工作中,我们开始梳理 SNC 和 VTA 之间复杂网络特性的差异,这可能是区域间敏感性差异的基础。所采用的方法和分析为研究多个深部脑结构和疾病中的网络拓扑结构提供了基础。