• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[老年心力衰竭患者经上半胸骨切开术行主动脉瓣置换术:病例报告]

[Aortic Valve Replacement through an Upper Hemisternotomy in an Eldery Patient with Heart Failure:Report of a Case].

作者信息

Ozawa Tatsuya, Kawasaki Yusuke, Suenaga Etsuro

机构信息

Divison of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Kyobu Geka. 2021 May;74(5):362-365.

PMID:33980796
Abstract

Cardiac surgery for elder patients should be minimally invasive because of their frailty and concomitant multiple chronic diseases. We performed aortic valve replacement (AVR) via upper hemisternotomy (UHS) on an 85-year-old patient who suffered from severe aortic regurgitation with dobutamine support. The postoperative course was uneventful. AVR via UHS is safer than that via right axiallary thoracotomy AVR with shorter aortic cross-clamp time, shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time and fewer complications. AVR via UHS makes ambulation and rehabilitation easier than AVR via full sternotomy, because of thoracic stability. It is more effective and should be more prevalent as minimally invasive cardiac surgery for eldery patients with frailty.

摘要

由于老年患者身体虚弱且常伴有多种慢性疾病,心脏手术应尽量采用微创方式。我们对一名85岁患有严重主动脉瓣反流且需多巴酚丁胺支持的患者进行了经上半胸骨切开术(UHS)的主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)。术后过程顺利。经UHS的AVR比经右腋下开胸AVR更安全,主动脉阻断时间更短,体外循环时间更短,并发症更少。由于胸廓稳定性,经UHS的AVR比经全胸骨切开术的AVR使患者行走和康复更容易。作为针对身体虚弱老年患者的微创心脏手术,它更有效且应更普遍应用。

相似文献

1
[Aortic Valve Replacement through an Upper Hemisternotomy in an Eldery Patient with Heart Failure:Report of a Case].[老年心力衰竭患者经上半胸骨切开术行主动脉瓣置换术:病例报告]
Kyobu Geka. 2021 May;74(5):362-365.
2
Upper Hemisternotomy Versus Full Sternotomy for Replacement of the Supracoronary Ascending Aorta and Aortic Valve.升主动脉及主动脉瓣置换术行胸骨上段切口与全胸骨正中切口的比较
Innovations (Phila). 2024 Jan-Feb;19(1):39-45. doi: 10.1177/15569845231213074. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.经上半胸骨小切口快速植入主动脉瓣的益处。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 26;15(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01268-y.
4
Stonehenge technique is associated with faster aortic clamp time in group of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right infra-axillary thoracotomy.在经右腋下胸壁切开术进行微创主动脉瓣置换的患者组中,巨石阵技术与更短的主动脉阻断时间相关。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;66(12):700-706. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-0987-x. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
5
Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Techniques and Median Sternotomy in Aortic Valve Replacement.两种微创技术与正中开胸主动脉瓣置换术的比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Sep;104(3):877-883. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.01.095. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
6
Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement.高龄患者再次行主动脉瓣置换术——经导管主动脉瓣置换时代的微创技术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.076. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
7
8
Is it safe to move away from a full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement?对于主动脉瓣置换术而言,不采用完全胸骨切开术是否安全?
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2020 Nov;28(9):553-559. doi: 10.1177/0218492320948321. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery and Single Vessel Coronary Artery Bypass via Limited Anterior Right Thoracotomy.经右前小切口的微创瓣膜手术及单支冠状动脉搭桥术。
Heart Surg Forum. 2015 Dec 21;18(6):E266-70. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1319.
10
Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients.肥胖患者经部分胸骨上段切开术行主动脉瓣置换术与传统主动脉瓣置换术的疗效比较。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Oct 1;27(4):481-486. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy083.