Aydın Numan, Topçu Fulya-Toksoy, Karaoğlanoğlu Serpil, Oktay Elif-Aybala, Erdemir Uğur
University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dental Treatment, Ankara, Turkey.
Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dental Treatment, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 May 1;13(5):e446-e454. doi: 10.4317/jced.58011. eCollection 2021 May.
This study is to examine the surface roughness and color changes occurring on composite resins following the application of different finishing and polishing systems.
In our study, a total of 200 samples were prepared from composites resin (6×2 mm) containing supra-nano, submicron hybrid, nanohybrid, nano-ceramic and microhybrid filler. They were polished with diamond, aluminum oxide, silicon carbide finishing and polishing systems. The initial color values of composite samples were measured with a spectrophotometer and surface roughness values with a profilometer. After that, samples were immersed of coffee solution and color measurements were repeated on the 1st and 7th day. The differences between surface roughness (Ra) and color change values (∆Eab) were evaluated using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (<0.05).
Finishing and polishing systems produced a statistically significant difference between the surface roughness values of nano-ceramic, submicron hybrid and microhybrid composite resin samples (<0.05). Supra nano composite, which showed the lowest surface roughness after all finishing and polishing systems, showed the least color change after 7 days compared to other composite groups (<0.05). The microhybrid composite with the highest surface roughness was the most color changing composite group (<0.5).
The spiral finishing and polishing system containing diamond particles was the system to provide the least color difference on all composite groups. However, color differences of all composite resin groups were found to exceed the perceptibility threshold (PT) and acceptability threshold (AT). Composite resin, color stability, surface roughness.
本研究旨在检测不同的修整和抛光系统应用于复合树脂后其表面粗糙度和颜色变化。
在我们的研究中,从含有超纳米、亚微米混合、纳米混合、纳米陶瓷和微混合填料的复合树脂中制备了总共200个样本(6×2毫米)。它们用金刚石、氧化铝、碳化硅修整和抛光系统进行抛光。用分光光度计测量复合样本的初始颜色值,用轮廓仪测量表面粗糙度值。之后,将样本浸入咖啡溶液中,并在第1天和第7天重复进行颜色测量。使用双向方差分析(ANOVA)检验评估表面粗糙度(Ra)和颜色变化值(∆Eab)之间的差异(<0.05)。
修整和抛光系统在纳米陶瓷、亚微米混合和微混合复合树脂样本的表面粗糙度值之间产生了统计学上的显著差异(<0.05)。在所有修整和抛光系统后表面粗糙度最低的超纳米复合材料,与其他复合组相比,7天后颜色变化最小(<0.05)。表面粗糙度最高的微混合复合材料是颜色变化最大的复合组(<0.5)。
含有金刚石颗粒的螺旋修整和抛光系统是在所有复合组上产生最小色差的系统。然而,发现所有复合树脂组的色差都超过了可察觉阈值(PT)和可接受阈值(AT)。复合树脂、颜色稳定性、表面粗糙度。