Mehanna Solange, Habre-Hallage Pascale
DDS, MSc. Clinical Instructor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
DDS, MSc, PhD. Professor, Director of the post-graduate program of fixed prosthodontics, Former Head of the Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 May 1;13(5):e479-e486. doi: 10.4317/jced.57802. eCollection 2021 May.
Interproximal contact loss (ICL) is a multifactorial implant complication. The aims of this prospective clinical study were to evaluate proximal contact alterations between implant-supported fixed prostheses (IFPs) and adjacent teeth and to identify potential contributing factors.
This study was conducted from April to September 2019 at the Department of Prosthodontics. Forty-three patients (23 females and 20 males, age range 31-70) treated with 43 posterior IFPs were recruited for this study. All proximal contacts (64) were checked visually and radiographically. Proximal contact tightness (PCT) was clinically evaluated using dental floss and measured during removal of a calibrated 0.05 mm thick metal strip previously inserted into the proximal area. Mesial and distal PCT were measured at restoration insertion (T0), 1-month follow-up (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2). ICL was assessed in relation to the patients' age, gender, smoking habits, implant system, proximal contact position, jaw position and restoration type of the implant prostheses. The significance level was set at P value ≤ 0.05.
The PCTs between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth decreased significantly between T0 and T2. Restoration type affected the loss of interproximal contact at the mesial (free-end restorations; = 0.008) and distal aspects (< 0.001), whereas implant system affected only the distal aspects of the proximal contacts ( = 0.002).
Proximal contact tightness between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth decreased over the 3-month observation period. Contact loss between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth may be influenced by restoration type and implant system. Adjacent teeth, dental implants, implant complication, implant fixed prostheses, interproximal contact loss, proximal contact strength, proximal contact tightness.
邻面接触丧失(ICL)是一种多因素导致的种植体并发症。这项前瞻性临床研究的目的是评估种植体支持的固定义齿(IFP)与相邻牙齿之间的邻面接触变化,并确定潜在的影响因素。
本研究于2019年4月至9月在口腔修复科进行。招募了43例接受43颗后牙IFP治疗的患者(23名女性和20名男性,年龄范围31 - 70岁)。所有邻面接触(64个)均通过视觉和影像学检查。使用牙线对邻面接触紧密度(PCT)进行临床评估,并在移除先前插入邻面区域的校准0.05毫米厚金属条时进行测量。在修复体植入时(T0)、1个月随访(T1)和3个月随访(T2)时测量近中及远中PCT。根据患者的年龄、性别、吸烟习惯、种植系统、邻面接触位置、颌位和种植义齿的修复类型评估ICL。显著性水平设定为P值≤0.05。
在T0和T2之间,固定种植义齿与相邻牙齿之间的PCT显著降低。修复类型影响近中(游离端修复体; = 0.008)和远中面(< 0.001)的邻面接触丧失,而种植系统仅影响邻面接触的远中面( = 0.002)。
在3个月的观察期内,固定种植义齿与相邻牙齿之间的邻面接触紧密度降低。固定种植义齿与相邻牙齿之间的接触丧失可能受修复类型和种植系统的影响。相邻牙齿、牙种植体、种植体并发症、种植固定义齿、邻面接触丧失、邻面接触强度、邻面接触紧密度。