• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Simulation of ventilatory-induced stone movement and its effect on stone fracture during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

作者信息

Whelan J P, Gravenstein N, Welch J L, Lampotang S, Newman R C, Finlayson B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.

出版信息

J Urol. 1988 Aug;140(2):405-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41645-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41645-4
PMID:3398162
Abstract

Because ventilation influences renal movement, we investigated the effect of stone motion on the efficiency of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Comparisons of the rates of fragmentation of an experimental model of renal calculi were made between simulated high-frequency jet ventilation at 100 breaths/min. with four-mm. stone movement as measured from the fluoroscope screen, conventional mechanical ventilation at 10 breaths/min. with 32-mm. stone movement as measured from the fluoroscope screen, and a static control. Fragmentation did not differ significantly between high-frequency jet ventilation and no ventilation (static control), but was significantly greater with high-frequency jet ventilation than with conventional ventilation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Simulation of ventilatory-induced stone movement and its effect on stone fracture during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
J Urol. 1988 Aug;140(2):405-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41645-4.
2
Clinical efficacy of high frequency jet ventilation during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteral calculi: a comparison with conventional mechanical ventilation.
J Urol. 1988 Mar;139(3):486-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42499-2.
3
Propagation of shock waves in elastic solids caused by cavitation microjet impact. II: Application in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.空化微射流冲击引起的弹性固体中冲击波的传播。II:在体外冲击波碎石术中的应用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Jul;94(1):29-36. doi: 10.1121/1.407088.
4
Comparison of two ventilation techniques during general anesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: high-frequency jet ventilation versus spontaneous ventilation with a laryngeal mask airway.体外冲击波碎石术全身麻醉期间两种通气技术的比较:高频喷射通气与喉罩气道自主通气。
Urology. 2007 Jul;70(1):7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.045.
5
An experimental model for the systematic investigation of stone fracture by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.一种用于通过体外冲击波碎石术对结石破碎进行系统研究的实验模型。
J Urol. 1988 Aug;140(2):395-400. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41643-0.
6
Shock wave physics.冲击波物理学。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1991 Apr;17(4):431-5. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80637-8.
7
[Use of high frequency jet ventilation in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy].
Anaesthesist. 1985 Jun;34(6):294-8.
8
Does the rate of extracorporeal shock wave delivery affect stone fragmentation?
Urology. 1999 Sep;54(3):430-2. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00176-4.
9
Effect of three anesthetic techniques on the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in nephrolithiasis.三种麻醉技术对肾结石体外冲击波碎石术成功率的影响。
Anesthesiology. 1988 Feb;68(2):272-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198802000-00016.
10
QRS-activated ventilation during general anesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术全身麻醉期间的QRS波激活通气
J Clin Anesth. 1989;1(4):268-71. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(89)90025-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing targeting strategies for lithotripsy through in-vitro and in vivo studies with consideration of respiratory regularity.通过体外和体内研究考虑呼吸规律性优化碎石术的靶向策略。
BMC Urol. 2024 Mar 21;24(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01422-x.
2
High-frequency jet ventilation is beneficial during shock wave lithotripsy utilizing a newer unit with a narrower focal zone.在使用具有更窄聚焦区的新型设备进行冲击波碎石术期间,高频喷射通气是有益的。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Oct;4(5):333-5. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.09160.