Raval Vishal, Bowen Randy Christopher, Soto Hansell, Singh Arun
Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2021 Mar;7(2):142-148. doi: 10.1159/000510506. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
The published data on ocular survival following intravenous chemotherapy of retinoblastoma (RB) seems to be skewed by evolving practice patterns induced by use of intravitreal chemotherapy (iVitc). We aimed to explore potential role of iVitc for vitreous seeding for patients treated with intravenous chemotherapy (IVC).
A literature search was performed to identify cases of RB treated with primary IVC prior to advent of iVitc by various search engines (PubMed, Medline, and Google) from 1992 to 2018. Studies were excluded if number of cases were less than 40 or lacked data related to type of recurrence and its treatment. Rates and patterns of recurrence and its management were categorized.
Out of 15 studies identified, only 10 studies (797 eyes) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at presentation was 15.3 months (range 0-192.8 months). Unilateral cases represented 25% of the cohort. The ocular survival rate with primary IVC was 63% (500/797 eyes). Of the 297 eyes (37%) that failed IVC therapy, additional 99 eyes could be salvaged with EBRT (599/797 eyes, 75%). Remaining 198 eyes were enucleated (198/797 eyes 25%). K-M survival analysis could not be done due lack of sufficient data. Recurrences that occurred (mean 12.2 months) after completion of primary IVC included relapse of retinal tumor (143 eyes [48%]), vitreous seeding (73 eyes [25%]), subretinal seeding (49 eyes [16%]), or any combination (103 eyes [35%]). Out of 73 eyes with vitreous seeding, additional 66 eyes (90%) would have been salvaged with iVitc, potentially improving ocular survival rates to 71% (500 + 66/797).
Evolving practice patterns of RB treatment have unfavorably skewed published ocular survival rates following IVC. With incorporation of iVitc, the ocular survival rates with IVC can be potentially improved to be non-inferior to those achieved with intra-arterial chemotherapy.
视网膜母细胞瘤(RB)静脉化疗后的眼部生存率公布数据似乎因玻璃体内化疗(iVitc)的应用导致治疗模式的演变而出现偏差。我们旨在探讨iVitc对接受静脉化疗(IVC)患者玻璃体种植的潜在作用。
通过各种搜索引擎(PubMed、Medline和谷歌)对1992年至2018年iVitc出现之前接受原发性IVC治疗的RB病例进行文献检索。如果病例数少于40或缺乏与复发类型及其治疗相关的数据,则排除相关研究。对复发率、复发模式及其处理方式进行分类。
在检索到的15项研究中,只有10项研究(797只眼)符合纳入标准。就诊时的平均年龄为15.3个月(范围0 - 192.8个月)。单侧病例占队列的25%。原发性IVC的眼部生存率为63%(500/797只眼)。在297只(37%)IVC治疗失败的眼中,另外99只眼可通过外照射放疗挽救(599/797只眼,75%)。其余198只眼被摘除(198/797只眼,25%)。由于缺乏足够数据,无法进行K-M生存分析。原发性IVC完成后发生的复发(平均12.2个月)包括视网膜肿瘤复发(143只眼[48%])、玻璃体种植(73只眼[25%])、视网膜下种植(49只眼[16%])或任何组合(103只眼[35%])。在73只发生玻璃体种植的眼中,另外66只眼(90%)可通过iVitc挽救,潜在地将眼部生存率提高到71%(500 + 66/797)。
RB治疗模式的演变对公布的IVC后眼部生存率产生了不利偏差。纳入iVitc后,IVC的眼部生存率可能提高到不低于动脉内化疗所达到的生存率。