Oldridge N B, Guyatt G H, Fischer M E, Rimm A A
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School--MCC, Milwaukee.
JAMA. 1988 Aug 19;260(7):945-50.
Randomized clinical trials of cardiac rehabilitation following myocardial infarction have typically demonstrated a lower mortality in treated patients, but with a statistically significant reduction in only one trial. To overcome the problem of not being able to detect small but clinically important benefits in mortality in randomized clinical trials of exercise and risk factor rehabilitation after myocardial infarction with small numbers of patients, we carried out a meta-analysis on the combined results of ten randomized clinical trials that included 4347 patients (control, 2145 patients; rehabilitation, 2202 patients). The pooled odds ratios of 0.76 (95% confidence intervals, 0.63 to 0.92) for all-cause death and of 0.75 (95% confidence intervals, 0.62 to 0.93) for cardiovascular death were significantly lower in the rehabilitation group than in the control group, with no significant difference for nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction. These results suggest that, for appropriately selected patients, comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation has a beneficial effect on mortality but not on nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction.
心肌梗死后心脏康复的随机临床试验通常表明,接受治疗的患者死亡率较低,但只有一项试验在统计学上有显著降低。为了克服在心肌梗死后运动和危险因素康复的随机临床试验中,由于患者数量较少而无法检测到死亡率方面虽小但具有临床重要意义的益处这一问题,我们对十项随机临床试验的综合结果进行了荟萃分析,这些试验共纳入4347例患者(对照组2145例患者;康复组2202例患者)。康复组全因死亡的合并比值比为0.76(95%置信区间为0.63至0.92),心血管死亡的合并比值比为0.75(95%置信区间为0.62至0.93),均显著低于对照组,非致命性再发心肌梗死方面无显著差异。这些结果表明,对于适当选择的患者,综合心脏康复对死亡率有有益影响,但对非致命性再发心肌梗死没有影响。