Pan Jie, Wang Zhi-Heng, Wang Xiao-Mei, Zuo Kai-Ni, Zhou Jia-Meng, Wang Wei, Lu Si-Qi, Zhu Wen-Tao, Zhang Li-Jing
School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Beijing 100029, China.
Department of Cardiology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Beijing 100700, China.
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2021 Apr;46(7):1832-1838. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20210209.501.
This research was to evaluate the economics of Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills combined with conventional therapy for patients with coronary heart disease(CHD) in Chinese medical environment. From the perspective of medical insurance, a Markov model was established in this study based on the results of Meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and safety of Shexiang Tongxin Dripping Pills combined with conventional treatment and conventional treatment alone. The experimental group was treated with She-xiang Tongxin Dropping Pills combined with conventional Western medicine treatment, while the control group was treated with conventional Western medicine treatment alone. The cost-utility analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed for the two regimens using Treeage pro. After 30 cycles of model simulation, according to the results of Markov model, the total cost and health output were CNY 237 795.73 and 16.36 QALYs(the quality adjusted life years, QALYs), respectively for Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills combined with conventional Western medicine treatment, CNY 247 396.55 and 16.36 QALYs respectively for the conventional Western medicine treatment alone. Compared with the conventional treatment alone, the Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills combined with conventional treatment had lower long-term cost and higher health output, with advantages of cost-utility and pharmacoeconomic advantages. The sensitivity analysis results showed that the conclusion was relatively stable. Based on the above results, it is considered that compared with the conventional Western medicine alone, Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pill combined with conventional Western medicine is a treatment regimen with pharmacoeconomic advantages for the treatment of CHD.
本研究旨在评估在中国医疗环境下,麝香通心滴丸联合传统疗法治疗冠心病(CHD)患者的经济性。从医疗保险的角度出发,本研究基于Meta分析结果建立了马尔可夫模型,比较了麝香通心滴丸联合传统治疗与单纯传统治疗的有效性和安全性。实验组采用麝香通心滴丸联合传统西药治疗,对照组采用单纯传统西药治疗。使用Treeage pro软件对两种治疗方案进行成本-效用分析和敏感性分析。经过30个周期的模型模拟,根据马尔可夫模型结果,麝香通心滴丸联合传统西药治疗的总成本和健康产出分别为237795.73元人民币和16.36个质量调整生命年(QALYs),单纯传统西药治疗分别为247396.55元人民币和16.36个QALYs。与单纯传统治疗相比,麝香通心滴丸联合传统治疗具有更低的长期成本和更高的健康产出,具有成本-效用优势和药物经济学优势。敏感性分析结果表明结论相对稳定。基于上述结果,认为与单纯传统西药相比,麝香通心滴丸联合传统西药是一种具有药物经济学优势的冠心病治疗方案。