• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 NoteAid 在社区医院环境中的有效性:一项针对电子健康记录笔记理解干预措施的随机试验,对象为患者。

Evaluating the Effectiveness of NoteAid in a Community Hospital Setting: Randomized Trial of Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension Interventions With Patients.

机构信息

Department of Information Technology, Analytics, and Operations, Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.

Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 13;23(5):e26354. doi: 10.2196/26354.

DOI:10.2196/26354
PMID:33983124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8160802/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interventions to define medical jargon have been shown to improve electronic health record (EHR) note comprehension among crowdsourced participants on Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT). However, AMT participants may not be representative of the general population or patients who are most at-risk for low health literacy.

OBJECTIVE

In this work, we assessed the efficacy of an intervention (NoteAid) for EHR note comprehension among participants in a community hospital setting.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from Lowell General Hospital (LGH), a community hospital in Massachusetts, to take the ComprehENotes test, a web-based test of EHR note comprehension. Participants were randomly assigned to control (n=85) or intervention (n=89) groups to take the test without or with NoteAid, respectively. For comparison, we used a sample of 200 participants recruited from AMT to take the ComprehENotes test (100 in the control group and 100 in the intervention group).

RESULTS

A total of 174 participants were recruited from LGH, and 200 participants were recruited from AMT. Participants in both intervention groups (community hospital and AMT) scored significantly higher than participants in the control groups (P<.001). The average score for the community hospital participants was significantly lower than the average score for the AMT participants (P<.001), consistent with the lower education levels in the community hospital sample. Education level had a significant effect on scores for the community hospital participants (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of NoteAid was associated with significantly improved EHR note comprehension in both community hospital and AMT samples. Our results demonstrate the generalizability of ComprehENotes as a test of EHR note comprehension and the effectiveness of NoteAid for improving EHR note comprehension.

摘要

背景

干预措施来定义医学术语已被证明可以提高在亚马逊机械土耳其(AMT)众包参与者对电子健康记录(EHR)注释的理解。然而,AMT 参与者可能无法代表一般人群或最有可能患有低健康素养的患者。

目的

在这项工作中,我们评估了一种干预措施(NoteAid)对马萨诸塞州洛厄尔综合医院(LGH)社区医院参与者 EHR 注释理解的效果。

方法

参与者从洛厄尔综合医院(LGH)招募,参加基于网络的 EHR 注释理解 ComprehENotes 测试。参与者被随机分配到对照组(n=85)或干预组(n=89),分别在没有或有 NoteAid 的情况下参加测试。为了进行比较,我们使用了从 AMT 招募的 200 名参与者的样本参加 ComprehENotes 测试(对照组 100 名,干预组 100 名)。

结果

共有 174 名参与者从 LGH 招募,200 名参与者从 AMT 招募。干预组(社区医院和 AMT)的参与者得分均明显高于对照组(P<.001)。社区医院参与者的平均得分明显低于 AMT 参与者的平均得分(P<.001),这与社区医院样本中较低的教育水平一致。教育水平对社区医院参与者的分数有显著影响(P<.001)。

结论

使用 NoteAid 与社区医院和 AMT 样本中 EHR 注释理解的显著提高相关。我们的结果表明,ComprehENotes 作为 EHR 注释理解测试具有普遍性,并且 NoteAid 对提高 EHR 注释理解是有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5910/8160802/bc9e7b0e2175/jmir_v23i5e26354_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5910/8160802/99d7cc727890/jmir_v23i5e26354_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5910/8160802/bc9e7b0e2175/jmir_v23i5e26354_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5910/8160802/99d7cc727890/jmir_v23i5e26354_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5910/8160802/bc9e7b0e2175/jmir_v23i5e26354_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Effectiveness of NoteAid in a Community Hospital Setting: Randomized Trial of Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension Interventions With Patients.评估 NoteAid 在社区医院环境中的有效性:一项针对电子健康记录笔记理解干预措施的随机试验,对象为患者。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 13;23(5):e26354. doi: 10.2196/26354.
2
Improving Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension With NoteAid: Randomized Trial of Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension Interventions With Crowdsourced Workers.使用NoteAid提高电子健康记录笔记的理解能力:针对众包工作者的电子健康记录笔记理解干预措施的随机试验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 16;21(1):e10793. doi: 10.2196/10793.
3
Evaluating the efficacy of NoteAid on EHR note comprehension among US Veterans through Amazon Mechanical Turk.通过亚马逊土耳其机器人评估 NoteAid 在美国退伍军人电子病历记录理解方面的效果。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Apr;172:105006. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105006. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
4
ComprehENotes, an Instrument to Assess Patient Reading Comprehension of Electronic Health Record Notes: Development and Validation.ComprehENotes,一种评估患者对电子健康记录笔记阅读理解能力的工具:开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 25;20(4):e139. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9380.
5
Improving patients' electronic health record comprehension with NoteAid.使用NoteAid提高患者对电子健康记录的理解。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:714-8.
6
A Natural Language Processing System That Links Medical Terms in Electronic Health Record Notes to Lay Definitions: System Development Using Physician Reviews.一种将电子健康记录笔记中的医学术语与通俗定义相链接的自然语言处理系统:利用医生评审进行系统开发。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 22;20(1):e26. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8669.
7
Evaluating Expert-Layperson Agreement in Identifying Jargon Terms in Electronic Health Record Notes: Observational Study.评估电子健康记录中的行话术语识别中的专家-非专业人士一致性:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 15;26:e49704. doi: 10.2196/49704.
8
Readability Formulas and User Perceptions of Electronic Health Records Difficulty: A Corpus Study.可读性公式与用户对电子健康记录难度的认知:一项语料库研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 2;19(3):e59. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6962.
9
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
10
Adult patient access to electronic health records.成年患者获取电子健康记录。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):CD012707. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012707.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Clinical Documentation with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.利用人工智能改善临床文档记录:一项系统综述。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2024 Jun 1;21(2):1d. eCollection 2024 Summer-Fall.
2
Individual Factors That Affect Laypeople's Understanding of Definitions of Medical Jargon.影响外行人对医学术语定义理解的个体因素。
Health Policy Technol. 2024 Dec;13(6). doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100932. Epub 2024 Nov 3.
3
Evaluating Expert-Layperson Agreement in Identifying Jargon Terms in Electronic Health Record Notes: Observational Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients Evaluate Visit Notes Written by Their Clinicians: a Mixed Methods Investigation.患者评价临床医生所写的就诊记录:一项混合方法研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):3510-3516. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06014-7. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
2
Care Partners and Patient Portals-Faulty Access, Threats to Privacy, and Ample Opportunity.护理伙伴与患者门户网站——访问故障、隐私威胁及大量机会。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jun 1;180(6):850-851. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0514.
3
The Views and Experiences of Clinicians Sharing Medical Record Notes With Patients.
评估电子健康记录中的行话术语识别中的专家-非专业人士一致性:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 15;26:e49704. doi: 10.2196/49704.
4
MedJEx: A Medical Jargon Extraction Model with Wiki's Hyperlink Span and Contextualized Masked Language Model Score.MedJEx:一种具有维基百科超链接跨度和上下文掩码语言模型评分的医学术语提取模型。
Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process. 2022 Dec;2022:11733-11751.
5
Evaluation of Patient-Friendly Diagnosis Clarifications in a Hospital Patient Portal.医院患者门户中便于患者理解的诊断澄清评估。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 May;14(3):455-464. doi: 10.1055/a-2067-5310. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
6
Evaluating the efficacy of NoteAid on EHR note comprehension among US Veterans through Amazon Mechanical Turk.通过亚马逊土耳其机器人评估 NoteAid 在美国退伍军人电子病历记录理解方面的效果。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Apr;172:105006. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105006. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
临床医生与患者共享病历记录的观点和体验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201753. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1753.
4
Mechanical Turk data collection in addiction research: utility, concerns and best practices.在成瘾研究中使用 Mechanical Turk 进行数据收集:效用、关注点和最佳实践。
Addiction. 2020 Oct;115(10):1960-1968. doi: 10.1111/add.15032. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
5
Adolescents' and Young Adults' Satisfaction with and Understanding of Medical Notes from a Pediatric Gastroenterology Practice: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.青少年和青年对儿科胃肠病学实践中医疗记录的满意度和理解程度的横断面队列研究。
J Pediatr. 2019 Dec;215:264-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.052. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
OpenNotes After 7 Years: Patient Experiences With Ongoing Access to Their Clinicians' Outpatient Visit Notes.7年后的开放病历:患者持续获取临床医生门诊病历记录的体验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 6;21(5):e13876. doi: 10.2196/13876.
7
Improving Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension With NoteAid: Randomized Trial of Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension Interventions With Crowdsourced Workers.使用NoteAid提高电子健康记录笔记的理解能力:针对众包工作者的电子健康记录笔记理解干预措施的随机试验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 16;21(1):e10793. doi: 10.2196/10793.
8
Correlation Between eHealth Literacy and Health Literacy Using the eHealth Literacy Scale and Real-Life Experiences in the Health Sector as a Proxy Measure of Functional Health Literacy: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey.使用电子健康素养量表及卫生部门的实际生活经历作为功能性健康素养的替代指标,探讨电子健康素养与健康素养之间的相关性:基于网络的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 31;20(10):e281. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9401.
9
Self-reported and objectively assessed knowledge of evidence-based practice terminology among healthcare students: A cross-sectional study.自我报告和客观评估医疗保健学生对循证实践术语的了解:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 12;13(7):e0200313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200313. eCollection 2018.
10
ComprehENotes, an Instrument to Assess Patient Reading Comprehension of Electronic Health Record Notes: Development and Validation.ComprehENotes,一种评估患者对电子健康记录笔记阅读理解能力的工具:开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 25;20(4):e139. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9380.