• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院患者门户中便于患者理解的诊断澄清评估。

Evaluation of Patient-Friendly Diagnosis Clarifications in a Hospital Patient Portal.

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Methodology, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2023 May;14(3):455-464. doi: 10.1055/a-2067-5310. Epub 2023 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1055/a-2067-5310
PMID:37003266
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10284629/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical data can be difficult to comprehend for patients, but only a limited number of patient-friendly terms and definitions are available to clarify medical concepts. Therefore, we developed an algorithm that generalizes diagnoses to more general concepts that do have patient-friendly terms and definitions in SNOMED CT. We implemented the generalizations, and diagnosis clarifications with synonyms and definitions that were already available, in the problem list of a hospital patient portal.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the extent to which the clarifications cover the diagnoses in the problem list, the extent to which clarifications are used and appreciated by patient portal users, and to explore differences in viewing problems and clarifications between subgroups of users and diagnoses.

METHODS

We measured the coverage of diagnoses by clarifications, usage of the problem list and the clarifications, and user, patient and diagnosis characteristics with aggregated, routinely available electronic health record and log file data. Additionally, patient portal users provided quantitative and qualitative feedback about the clarification quality.

RESULTS

Of all patient portal users who viewed diagnoses on their problem list ( = 2,660), 89% had one or more diagnoses with clarifications. In addition, 55% of patient portal users viewed the clarifications. Users who rated the clarifications ( = 108) considered the clarifications to be of good quality on average, with a median rating per patient of 6 (interquartile range: 4-7; from 1 very bad to 7 very good). Users commented that they found clarifications to be clear and recognized the clarifications from their own experience, but sometimes also found the clarifications incomplete or disagreed with the diagnosis itself.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the clarifications are used and appreciated by patient portal users. Further research and development will be dedicated to the maintenance and further quality improvement of the clarifications.

摘要

背景

医学数据对于患者来说可能难以理解,但能够澄清医学概念的患者友好术语和定义数量有限。因此,我们开发了一种算法,将诊断概括为更通用的概念,这些概念在 SNOMED CT 中确实有患者友好的术语和定义。我们在医院患者门户的问题列表中实现了这些概括以及同义词和定义的诊断澄清。

目的

我们旨在评估澄清在多大程度上涵盖了问题列表中的诊断,患者门户用户使用和欣赏澄清的程度,以及探索用户和诊断亚组在查看问题和澄清方面的差异。

方法

我们使用聚合的、常规可用的电子健康记录和日志文件数据来衡量诊断被澄清的程度、问题列表和澄清的使用情况以及用户、患者和诊断特征。此外,患者门户用户提供了有关澄清质量的定量和定性反馈。

结果

在查看其问题列表上的诊断的所有患者门户用户中(n = 2660),89%的患者有一个或多个诊断有澄清。此外,55%的患者门户用户查看了澄清。对澄清进行评分的用户(n = 108)平均认为澄清质量良好,每位患者的中位数评分为 6(四分位距:4-7;1 分表示非常差,7 分表示非常好)。用户评论说,他们发现澄清很清楚,并从自己的经验中认识到澄清,但有时也发现澄清不完整或不同意诊断本身。

结论

本研究表明,澄清得到了患者门户用户的使用和赞赏。进一步的研究和开发将致力于澄清的维护和进一步质量改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/7e4ef644097f/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/d1ac35d61066/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/ecc506881135/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/015eac4aa159/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/b7ac73130e7b/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/bc24f8dd3f52/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/7e4ef644097f/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/d1ac35d61066/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/ecc506881135/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/015eac4aa159/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/b7ac73130e7b/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/bc24f8dd3f52/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/10284629/7e4ef644097f/10-1055-a-2067-5310-i202210ra0283-6.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Patient-Friendly Diagnosis Clarifications in a Hospital Patient Portal.医院患者门户中便于患者理解的诊断澄清评估。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 May;14(3):455-464. doi: 10.1055/a-2067-5310. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
2
Diagnosis clarification by generalization to patient-friendly terms and definitions: Validation study.通过概括为患者友好的术语和定义来明确诊断:验证研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 May;129:104071. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104071. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
3
Clarifying Diagnoses to Laymen by Employing the SNOMED CT Hierarchy.通过使用SNOMED CT层次结构向非专业人士阐明诊断结果。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:900-904.
4
Evaluation of lexical clarification by patients reading their clinical notes: a quasi-experimental interview study.患者阅读临床记录时对词义澄清的评估:一项准实验性访谈研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 15;20(Suppl 10):278. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01286-9.
5
A Web-Based Patient Portal for Mental Health Care: Benefits Evaluation.用于精神卫生保健的基于网络的患者门户:效益评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 16;18(11):e294. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6483.
6
Evaluation of SNOMED CT Grouper Accuracy and Coverage in Organizing the Electronic Health Record Problem List by Clinical System: Observational Study.通过临床系统评估SNOMED CT分组器在整理电子健康记录问题列表方面的准确性和覆盖范围:观察性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 May 9;12:e51274. doi: 10.2196/51274.
7
Metrics for Outpatient Portal Use Based on Log File Analysis: Algorithm Development.基于日志文件分析的门诊患者门户使用指标:算法开发
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 12;22(6):e16849. doi: 10.2196/16849.
8
Patient Portals Facilitating Engagement With Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review.促进住院电子病历参与度的患者门户:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 11;21(4):e12779. doi: 10.2196/12779.
9
The Use of an Electronic Health Record Patient Portal to Access Diagnostic Test Results by Emergency Patients at an Academic Medical Center: Retrospective Study.学术医疗中心急诊患者使用电子健康记录患者门户获取诊断测试结果:回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 28;21(6):e13791. doi: 10.2196/13791.
10
Pharmacy Customers' Experiences of Use, Usability, and Satisfaction of a Nationwide Patient Portal: Survey Study.全国患者门户的使用体验、可用性和满意度:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 16;23(7):e25368. doi: 10.2196/25368.

引用本文的文献

1
Timing of Liver Imaging Result Release Is Associated with Patients with Cirrhosis Reviewing Results Prior to Providers.肝脏成像结果发布的时间与肝硬化患者在医生之前查看结果有关。
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Mar;16(2):345-349. doi: 10.1055/a-2494-1722. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
2
The State-of-the-Art of Patient Portals: Adapting to External Factors, Addressing Barriers, and Innovating.患者门户的最新进展:适应外部因素、解决障碍和创新。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):654-669. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770901. Epub 2023 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Presenting complaint: use of language that disempowers patients.主要诉述:使用使患者失去力量的语言。
BMJ. 2022 Apr 27;377:e066720. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066720.
2
Diagnosis clarification by generalization to patient-friendly terms and definitions: Validation study.通过概括为患者友好的术语和定义来明确诊断:验证研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 May;129:104071. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104071. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
3
Anticipated Benefits and Concerns of Sharing Hospital Outpatient Visit Notes With Patients (Open Notes) in Dutch Hospitals: Mixed Methods Study.
荷兰医院中与患者共享门诊病历(开放病历)的预期益处和顾虑(Open Notes):混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 11;23(8):e27764. doi: 10.2196/27764.
4
Evaluating the Effectiveness of NoteAid in a Community Hospital Setting: Randomized Trial of Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension Interventions With Patients.评估 NoteAid 在社区医院环境中的有效性:一项针对电子健康记录笔记理解干预措施的随机试验,对象为患者。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 13;23(5):e26354. doi: 10.2196/26354.
5
Words Matter: What Do Patients Find Judgmental or Offensive in Outpatient Notes?用词需谨慎:门诊病历中,患者觉得哪些用词带有评判或冒犯意味?
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2571-2578. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06432-7. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
Evaluation of lexical clarification by patients reading their clinical notes: a quasi-experimental interview study.患者阅读临床记录时对词义澄清的评估:一项准实验性访谈研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 15;20(Suppl 10):278. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01286-9.
7
The State of Evidence in Patient Portals: Umbrella Review.患者门户中的证据现状:伞式综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 11;22(11):e23851. doi: 10.2196/23851.
8
Patient Perception of Plain-Language Medical Notes Generated Using Artificial Intelligence Software: Pilot Mixed-Methods Study.患者对使用人工智能软件生成的通俗易懂的医疗记录的认知:混合方法试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jun 5;4(6):e16670. doi: 10.2196/16670.
9
Design, development and validation of a system for automatic help to medical text understanding.用于辅助医学文本理解的自动系统的设计、开发与验证。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jun;138:104109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104109. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
10
Improving Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension With NoteAid: Randomized Trial of Electronic Health Record Note Comprehension Interventions With Crowdsourced Workers.使用NoteAid提高电子健康记录笔记的理解能力:针对众包工作者的电子健康记录笔记理解干预措施的随机试验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 16;21(1):e10793. doi: 10.2196/10793.