Affective Neuroscience and Psychophysiology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Neurocognitive Developmental Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Psychophysiology. 2021 Aug;58(8):e13838. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13838. Epub 2021 May 13.
In everyday life, faces with emotional expressions quickly attract attention and eye movements. To study the neural mechanisms of such emotion-driven attention by means of event-related brain potentials (ERPs), tasks that employ covert shifts of attention are commonly used, in which participants need to inhibit natural eye movements towards stimuli. It remains, however, unclear how shifts of attention to emotional faces with and without eye movements differ from each other. The current preregistered study aimed to investigate neural differences between covert and overt emotion-driven attention. We combined eye tracking with measurements of ERPs to compare shifts of attention to faces with happy, angry, or neutral expressions when eye movements were either executed (go conditions) or withheld (no-go conditions). Happy and angry faces led to larger EPN amplitudes, shorter latencies of the P1 component, and faster saccades, suggesting that emotional expressions significantly affected shifts of attention. Several ERPs (N170, EPN, LPC) were augmented in amplitude when attention was shifted with an eye movement, indicating an enhanced neural processing of faces if eye movements had to be executed together with a reallocation of attention. However, the modulation of ERPs by facial expressions did not differ between the go and no-go conditions, suggesting that emotional content enhances both covert and overt shifts of attention. In summary, our results indicate that overt and covert attention shifts differ but are comparably affected by emotional content.
在日常生活中,带有情绪表达的面孔会迅速引起人们的注意和眼球运动。为了通过事件相关电位(ERP)研究这种情绪驱动注意力的神经机制,通常使用需要抑制对刺激自然眼球运动的隐蔽性注意力转移任务。然而,对于有和没有眼球运动的情绪面孔的注意力转移之间的差异,仍然不清楚。本预先注册的研究旨在调查隐蔽和显性情绪驱动注意力之间的神经差异。我们结合眼动追踪和 ERP 测量,比较了在执行(go 条件)或抑制(no-go 条件)眼球运动时,对带有快乐、愤怒或中性表情的面孔的注意力转移。快乐和愤怒的面孔导致更大的 EPN 振幅、P1 成分的潜伏期更短以及更快的眼跳,这表明情绪表达显著影响了注意力的转移。当注意力伴随着眼球运动转移时,几个 ERP(N170、EPN、LPC)的振幅增加,表明如果必须同时执行眼球运动和重新分配注意力,那么对脸部的神经处理会增强。然而,在 go 和 no-go 条件之间,面部表情对 ERP 的调制没有差异,这表明情绪内容增强了隐蔽和显性的注意力转移。总之,我们的结果表明,显性和隐性注意力转移不同,但都受到情绪内容的影响。