Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Apr;47(4):652-670. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000962. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
Retrieval enhances subsequent memory more than restudy (i.e., the testing effect), demonstrating the encoding (or reencoding) effects of retrieval. It is important to delineate the nature of the encoding effects of retrieval especially in comparison to traditional encoding processes. The current study examined if the level of retrieval, analogous to the level of processing during encoding, has an effect on subsequent memory. In 4 experiments, participants studied short lists of words, each followed by a retrieval or restudy trial. A final free recall test was given at the end of the experiment. The level of retrieval was manipulated by asking participants to retrieve words with a semantic or phonemic cue in the retrieval trial. In order to isolate the effects of retrieval per se, the semantic or phonemic cue was also presented in the restudy trial. Experiment 1 manipulated levels of retrieval (and restudy) between subjects while Experiment 2 manipulated levels within subjects. Experiment 3 sought to enhance the levels effect by adding an overt levels judgment, and Experiment 4 sought to rule out an alternative account of the equality of the testing effects across levels by increasing the list length. In all 4 experiments, a robust testing effect was obtained but it was not moderated by level of retrieval, a result supported by a small-scale meta-analysis, which demonstrated an overall effect of levels and testing condition, but no interaction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
检索比复习(即测试效应)更能增强后续记忆,证明了检索的编码(或重新编码)效应。重要的是要区分检索的编码效应的性质,特别是与传统编码过程相比。本研究考察了检索的水平(类似于编码过程中的加工水平)是否对后续记忆有影响。在 4 项实验中,参与者学习了一系列简短的单词,每个单词后面都有一个检索或复习试验。在实验结束时进行了最后的自由回忆测试。通过要求参与者在检索试验中使用语义或语音提示来检索单词来操纵检索水平。为了分离检索本身的效果,在复习试验中也呈现了语义或语音提示。实验 1 在被试间操纵检索(和复习)水平,而实验 2 在被试内操纵水平。实验 3 通过增加显性水平判断来增强水平效应,实验 4 通过增加列表长度来排除水平测试效应相等的替代解释。在所有 4 项实验中,都获得了强大的测试效应,但它不受检索水平的调节,这一结果得到了小规模元分析的支持,该分析表明了总体的水平和测试条件的效果,但没有交互作用。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。