Veltre Mary T, Cho Kit W, Neely James H
a Department of Psychology , University at Albany, State University of New York , Albany , NY , USA.
Memory. 2015;23(8):1229-37. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.970196. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
The testing effect is the finding that taking a review test enhances performance on a final test relative to restudying the material. The present experiment investigated transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect using semantic and orthographic cues to evoke conceptual and data-driven processing, respectively. After a study phase, subjects either restudied the material or took a cued-recall test consisting of half semantic and half orthographic cues in which the correct response was given as feedback. A final, cued-recall test consisted of the identical cue, or a new cue that was of the same type or different type of cue (semantic/orthographic or orthographic/semantic) as that used for that target in the review test. Testing enhanced memory in all conditions. When the review cues and final-test cues were identical, final recall was higher for semantic than orthographic cues. Consistent with test-based transfer-appropriate processing, memory performance improved as the review and final cues became more similar. These results suggest that the testing effect could potentially be caused by the episodic retrieval processes in a final memory test overlapping more with the episodic retrieval processes in a review test than with the encoding operations performed during restudy.
测试效应是指相对于重新学习材料,进行复习测试能提高期末考试成绩这一发现。本实验使用语义线索和正字法线索分别引发概念驱动加工和数据驱动加工,研究了测试效应中的迁移适当加工。在学习阶段之后,被试要么重新学习材料,要么进行一个线索回忆测试,该测试由一半语义线索和一半正字法线索组成,正确答案作为反馈给出。最终的线索回忆测试由相同的线索,或者与复习测试中用于该目标的线索类型相同或不同的新线索(语义/正字法或正字法/语义)组成。在所有条件下,测试都增强了记忆。当复习线索和最终测试线索相同时,语义线索的最终回忆高于正字法线索。与基于测试的迁移适当加工一致,随着复习线索和最终线索变得更加相似,记忆表现得到改善。这些结果表明,测试效应可能是由于最终记忆测试中的情景检索过程与复习测试中的情景检索过程比与重新学习期间执行的编码操作更重叠而导致的。