• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蟑螂暴露及其在哮喘患者中的过敏致敏作用。

Cockroach exposure and its allergy sensitization in asthma patients.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi.

Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Vocational Studies and Applied Sciences, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida U.P.

出版信息

Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2021 May 11;91(3). doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2021.1685.

DOI:10.4081/monaldi.2021.1685
PMID:33985325
Abstract

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease with distinct phenotypes. Serum tIgE, SSIgE and SPT are the methods of evaluating allergen sensitization. The present study evaluates the exposure and sensitization to cockroach (Periplaneta americana) antigens in asthma patients in a metropolitan city of India. The study enrolled 200 consecutive bronchial asthma patients, diagnosed as per GINA guidelines. As per history of exposure to cockroaches, the patients are divided in two groups as exposed and non-exposed asthmatic. All the enrolled subjects underwent SPT against common aeroallergens including cockroach, spirometry and estimation of tIgE level and SSIgE against cockroach. Out of 200 asthma patients, a total of 114 (57%) asthmatic were found SPT positive against one of the common aeroallergens, of which 68 (34%) showed SPT sensitivity against cockroach. A total of 103 (51.5%) patients were found exposed to cockroaches. In the cockroach exposed group, the mean serum tIgE was found significantly higher than the non-exposed group (569.31±224.64 vs 479.29±237 IU/ml; p=0.007). The mean SSIgE against cockroach in exposed groups was found not significant than non-expose group (4.87±11.19 vs 4.11±8.39 KUA/L; p=0.589). The mean tIgE was also not significant in atopic compared to non-atopic asthmatic (553.25±218.12 IU/ml vs 489.1±251.16 IU/ml; p=0.056). The mean SSIgE against cockroach was 5.66±10.45 KUA/L for atopic and 2.96±8.98 KUA/L for non-atopic (p=0.054). The airway obstruction was almost the same in both groups.  Asthmatic patients who were exposed to cockroach and atopic had high tIgE, SSIgE levels and SPT positivity against cockroach antigen compared to non-exposed patients.

摘要

哮喘是一种具有不同表型的异质性疾病。血清总 IgE、特异性 IgE 和皮肤点刺试验是评估过敏原致敏的方法。本研究评估了印度一个大都市区哮喘患者对蟑螂(美洲大蠊)抗原的暴露和致敏情况。该研究纳入了 200 名连续的支气管哮喘患者,按照 GINA 指南进行诊断。根据接触蟑螂的病史,将患者分为暴露组和非暴露组哮喘。所有入组患者均接受常见气传过敏原(包括蟑螂)的皮肤点刺试验、肺功能检查和总 IgE 水平及特异性 IgE 检测。在 200 名哮喘患者中,共有 114 名(57%)哮喘患者对一种常见气传过敏原呈皮肤点刺试验阳性,其中 68 名(34%)对蟑螂呈皮肤点刺试验敏感性。共有 103 名(51.5%)患者接触过蟑螂。在接触蟑螂的患者中,血清总 IgE 明显高于未接触组(569.31±224.64 vs 479.29±237 IU/ml;p=0.007)。接触组的蟑螂特异性 IgE 均值与未接触组相比无显著差异(4.87±11.19 vs 4.11±8.39 KUA/L;p=0.589)。与非特应性哮喘患者相比,特应性哮喘患者的总 IgE 也无显著差异(553.25±218.12 IU/ml vs 489.1±251.16 IU/ml;p=0.056)。蟑螂特异性 IgE 为 5.66±10.45 KUA/L 的特应性患者和 2.96±8.98 KUA/L 的非特应性患者相比,(p=0.054)。两组气道阻塞程度几乎相同。与未接触蟑螂的患者相比,接触蟑螂且特应性的哮喘患者对蟑螂抗原的总 IgE、特异性 IgE 水平和皮肤点刺试验阳性率更高。

相似文献

1
Cockroach exposure and its allergy sensitization in asthma patients.蟑螂暴露及其在哮喘患者中的过敏致敏作用。
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2021 May 11;91(3). doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2021.1685.
2
A Comparative Study of Skin Prick Test versus Serum-Specific IgE Measurement in Indian Patients with Bronchial Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis.印度支气管哮喘和过敏性鼻炎患者皮肤点刺试验与血清特异性IgE检测的比较研究
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2015 Apr-Jun;57(2):81-5.
3
Prevalence of sensitivity to cockroach allergens and IgE cross-reactivity between cockroach and house dust mite allergens in Chinese patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma.中国过敏性鼻炎和哮喘患者对蟑螂过敏原的敏感性及蟑螂和屋尘螨过敏原之间 IgE 交叉反应性的流行情况。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Dec;123(24):3540-4.
4
Allergy to cockroaches: challenges in diagnosis.蟑螂过敏:诊断中的挑战。
Clin Lab. 2011;57(11-12):969-74.
5
Evaluation of the relationship between cockroach sensitivity and house-dust-mite sensitivity in Turkish asthmatic patients.土耳其哮喘患者中蟑螂敏感性与屋尘螨敏感性之间关系的评估。
Respir Med. 2005 Aug;99(8):1032-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.12.013.
6
[Sensitization characteristics of cockroach in Beijing area].[北京地区蟑螂的致敏特性]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Nov;36(11):835-840. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.11.005.
7
House dust mite and cockroach exposure are strong risk factors for positive allergy skin test responses in the Childhood Asthma Management Program.在儿童哮喘管理项目中,接触屋尘螨和蟑螂是皮肤过敏试验呈阳性反应的强烈风险因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Jan;107(1):48-54. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.111146.
8
Allergy to cockroaches in patients with asthma and rhinitis in an urban area (Madrid).城市地区(马德里)哮喘和鼻炎患者对蟑螂的过敏反应
Allergy. 1996 Aug;51(8):582-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1996.tb04672.x.
9
Cockroach allergens and asthma in Brazil: identification of tropomyosin as a major allergen with potential cross-reactivity with mite and shrimp allergens.巴西的蟑螂过敏原与哮喘:将原肌球蛋白鉴定为一种主要过敏原,它可能与螨虫和虾类过敏原发生交叉反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Aug;104(2 Pt 1):329-37. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70375-1.
10
Occupational health risks due to shipboard cockroaches.船上蟑螂带来的职业健康风险。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 May;81(6):727-34. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0247-3. Epub 2007 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Entomopathogenic Nematodes as Biocontrol Agents Against Two Major Cockroach Species, and , in Antalya, Türkiye.评估昆虫病原线虫作为针对土耳其安塔利亚两种主要蟑螂物种([此处可能遗漏两种蟑螂物种名称])的生物防治剂。
Pathogens. 2025 Jul 1;14(7):655. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14070655.
2
Cross-reactivity and sensitization profiles of cockroach and moth allergens provide new insights in cockroach-allergic patients.蟑螂和飞蛾过敏原的交叉反应性及致敏情况为蟑螂过敏患者提供了新的见解。
World Allergy Organ J. 2025 May 7;18(5):101057. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2025.101057. eCollection 2025 May.
3
[Sensitization characteristics of cockroach in Beijing area].
[北京地区蟑螂的致敏特性]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Nov;36(11):835-840. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.11.005.