Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/SantoRicceri.
Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/JamesSalazarMD.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 May 18;77(19):2353-2362. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.03.299.
In the POST SCD study, the authors autopsied all World Health Organization (WHO)-defined sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs) and found that only 56% had an arrhythmic cause; resuscitated sudden cardiac arrests (SCAs) were excluded because they did not die suddenly. They hypothesized that causes underlying resuscitated SCAs would be similarly heterogeneous.
The aim of this study was to determine the causes and outcomes of resuscitated SCAs.
The authors identified all out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) from February 1, 2011, to January 1, 2015, of patients aged 18 to 90 years in San Francisco County. Resuscitated SCAs were OHCAs surviving to hospitalization and meeting WHO criteria for suddenness. Underlying cause was determined by comprehensive record review.
The authors identified 734 OHCAs over 48 months; 239 met SCA criteria, 133 (55.6%) were resuscitated to hospitalization, and 47 (19.7%) survived to discharge. Arrhythmic causes accounted for significantly more resuscitated SCAs overall (92 of 133, 69.1%), particularly among survivors (43 of 47, 91.5%), than WHO-defined SCDs in POST SCD (293 of 525, 55.8%; p < 0.004 for both). Among resuscitated SCAs, arrhythmic cause, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation initial rhythm, and white race were independent predictors of survival. None of the resuscitated SCAs due to neurologic causes survived.
In this 4-year countywide study of OHCAs, only one-third were sudden, of which one-half were resuscitated to hospitalization and 1 in 5 survived to discharge. Arrhythmic cause predicted survival and nearly one-half of nonsurvivors had nonarrhythmic causes, suggesting that SCA survivors are not equivalent to SCDs. Early identification of nonarrhythmic SCAs, such as neurologic emergencies, may be a target to improve OHCA survival.
在 POST SCD 研究中,作者对所有世界卫生组织(WHO)定义的心脏性猝死(SCD)进行了尸检,发现只有 56%的猝死有心律失常原因;复苏后的心脏骤停(SCA)被排除在外,因为它们不是突然死亡。他们假设复苏后的 SCA 的潜在原因也会类似地具有异质性。
本研究旨在确定复苏后 SCA 的原因和结果。
作者从 2011 年 2 月 1 日至 2015 年 1 月 1 日期间确定了旧金山县所有年龄在 18 至 90 岁之间的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者。复苏后的 SCA 是指存活至住院且符合 WHO 突然性标准的 OHCA。通过全面的病历回顾确定潜在病因。
作者在 48 个月内确定了 734 例 OHCA;239 例符合 SCA 标准,133 例(55.6%)复苏至住院,47 例(19.7%)存活至出院。心律失常原因在整体上占复苏后的 SCA 比例更高(133 例中的 92 例,69.1%),尤其是幸存者(47 例中的 43 例,91.5%),高于 POST SCD 中 WHO 定义的 SCD(525 例中的 293 例,55.8%;两者均 p<0.004)。在复苏后的 SCA 中,心律失常原因、室性心动过速/颤动初始节律和白色人种是存活的独立预测因素。没有一例因神经原因导致的复苏后的 SCA 存活。
在这项为期 4 年的全县 OHCA 研究中,只有三分之一是突然发生的,其中一半复苏至住院,五分之一存活至出院。心律失常原因预测存活,近一半的非幸存者有非心律失常原因,这表明 SCA 幸存者与 SCD 不同。早期识别非心律失常性 SCA,如神经急症,可能是提高 OHCA 存活率的目标。