From Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation in Health (IIMPACT in Health) (B.H., M.C.R.), Allied Health and Human Performance Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide; Graduate School of Health, Discipline of Physiotherapy (A.B.M.), University of Technology Sydney, Australia; and Department of Exercise Sciences (L.V.B.), University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Neurology. 2021 Jul 27;97(4):170-180. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012187. Epub 2021 May 13.
New treatments that can facilitate neural repair and reduce persistent impairments have significant value in promoting recovery following stroke. One technique that has gained interest is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as early research suggested it could enhance plasticity and enable greater behavioral recovery. However, several studies have now identified substantial intersubject variability in response to tDCS and clinical trials revealed insufficient evidence of treatment effectiveness. A possible explanation for the varied and negative findings is that the physiologic model of stroke recovery that researchers have used to guide the application of tDCS-based treatments in stroke is overly simplistic and does not account for stroke heterogeneity or known determinants that affect the tDCS response. Here, we propose that tDCS could have a more clearly beneficial role in enhancing stroke recovery if greater consideration is given to individualizing treatment. By critically reviewing the proposed mechanisms of tDCS, stroke physiology across the recovery continuum, and known determinants of tDCS response, we propose a new, theoretical, patient-tailored approach to delivering tDCS after stroke. The proposed model includes a step-by-step principled selection strategy for identifying optimal neuromodulation targets and outlines key areas for further investigation. Tailoring tDCS treatment to individual neuroanatomy and physiology is likely our best chance at producing robust and meaningful clinical benefit for people with stroke and would therefore accelerate opportunities for clinical translation.
新的治疗方法可以促进神经修复并减少持续的损伤,在中风后促进恢复方面具有重要价值。一种引起关注的技术是经颅直流电刺激(tDCS),因为早期研究表明它可以增强可塑性并实现更大的行为恢复。然而,现在有几项研究已经确定了对 tDCS 的反应存在很大的个体间差异,临床试验也显示出治疗效果的证据不足。造成这种不同和负面结果的一个可能解释是,研究人员用于指导基于 tDCS 的治疗在中风中的应用的中风恢复生理模型过于简单化,并且没有考虑到中风的异质性或已知影响 tDCS 反应的决定因素。在这里,我们提出,如果更注重个体化治疗,tDCS 可能会在增强中风恢复方面发挥更明显的有益作用。通过批判性地回顾 tDCS 的拟议机制、中风恢复连续体上的生理学以及 tDCS 反应的已知决定因素,我们提出了一种新的、理论上的、针对中风后患者的 tDCS 个性化治疗方法。该模型包括一个逐步的原则性选择策略,用于确定最佳的神经调节靶点,并概述了进一步研究的关键领域。根据个体神经解剖学和生理学来调整 tDCS 治疗可能是为中风患者带来稳健且有意义的临床益处的最佳机会,因此也将加速临床转化的机会。