Faluk Mohammed, Hasan Syed Mustajab, Jiang Tianyu, Abdelmaseih Ramy, Patel Jigar
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Ocala Regional Medical Center, Internal Medicine Residency Program, Ocala, Florida, USA.
Heart Views. 2020 Oct-Dec;21(4):269-275. doi: 10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_92_20. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
Despite advancements in the field interventional cardiology, the prognosis in patients who suffer from cardiogenic shock is poor. Over the years, the use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices has increased with the aim to improve short- and long-term outcomes. In this article, we aim to review the different modalities available for MCS devices and current literature comparing their uses.
尽管介入心脏病学领域取得了进展,但心源性休克患者的预后仍然很差。多年来,经皮机械循环支持(MCS)设备的使用有所增加,目的是改善短期和长期预后。在本文中,我们旨在回顾MCS设备可用的不同模式以及比较其用途的当前文献。