Suppr超能文献

急诊科气溶胶给药的综述。

Review of aerosol delivery in the emergency department.

作者信息

Dailey Patricia A, Shockley Courtney M

机构信息

Department of Medical Affairs, Senior Medical Science Liaison, Galway, Ireland.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2021 Apr;9(7):591. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4724.

Abstract

Aerosol delivery is a vital therapeutic strategy for both adult and pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department with respiratory distress. Aerosolized bronchodilators are frequently used as rescue medications for patients with diagnoses of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or pneumonia. Historically, emergency department providers utilized jet nebulizers (JNs) for medication delivery, but were challenged by a need for increasingly higher bronchodilator doses to elicit the desired response. Advancements in technology have led to the development of newer specialized aerosol delivery devices and treatment strategies which provide clinicians with improved options for aerosol delivery but may also cause some uncertainty regarding appropriate device selection. Initial investigations comparing these devices presented valuable evidence of benefit but were unable to demonstrate corresponding improvement in clinical results. More recently there has been an influx of clinical evidence that suggests improved clinical outcomes associated with more efficient aerosol delivery devices such as vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN) compared to the standard JN device. VMN will likely become an increasingly important tool in emergency department treatment of patients with respiratory distress. Additional controlled studies are needed both to examine the effects of VMN on patient outcomes, as well as to analyze how performance differences between aerosol devices may affect dosing strategies. Future efforts should also focus on applying new evidence in the form of updated consensus guidelines and standardized treatment strategies.

摘要

对于因呼吸窘迫而到急诊科就诊的成人和儿童患者,雾化给药是一种至关重要的治疗策略。雾化支气管扩张剂经常被用作哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或肺炎患者的急救药物。从历史上看,急诊科医护人员使用喷射式雾化器(JNs)进行药物输送,但因需要越来越高剂量的支气管扩张剂才能产生预期反应而面临挑战。技术进步促使了更新的专门雾化给药装置和治疗策略的发展,这些为临床医生提供了更好的雾化给药选择,但在合适设备的选择上也可能造成一些不确定性。对这些设备进行比较的初步研究提供了有价值的获益证据,但未能证明临床结果有相应改善。最近有大量临床证据表明,与标准的喷射式雾化器(JN)设备相比,诸如振动网孔雾化器(VMN)等更高效的雾化给药设备能带来更好的临床效果。振动网孔雾化器很可能会成为急诊科治疗呼吸窘迫患者越来越重要的工具。还需要更多对照研究,以检验振动网孔雾化器对患者治疗结果的影响,以及分析雾化设备之间的性能差异如何可能影响给药策略。未来的工作还应侧重于以更新的共识指南和标准化治疗策略的形式应用新证据。

相似文献

1
Review of aerosol delivery in the emergency department.急诊科气溶胶给药的综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Apr;9(7):591. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4724.

本文引用的文献

3
Sterility and Stability Testing of Preservative-free Albuterol.无防腐剂沙丁胺醇的无菌和稳定性测试。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jan-Feb;24(1):53-57. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-24.1.53.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验