Does splenectomy significantly improve the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with hypersplenism? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Whether hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with hypersplenism can benefit from splenectomy is unclear. This study aimed at exploring the efficacy and safety of concurrent splenectomy for HCC patients with hypersplenism.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were systematically searched to compare data on the combination of hepatectomy or transhepatic arterial infusion (TAI) with splenectomy (the splenectomy group) with data on hepatectomy or TAI alone (the non-splenectomy group) for the treatment of HCC with hypersplenism. Prospective clinical trials or retrospective cohort studies from inception to May 10, 2020 were considered eligible for this analysis. The relevant outcomes, including patients' demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative indices and long-term outcomes, were independently extracted by two investigators. Publication bias for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was qualitatively assessed by funnel plots and quantitatively evaluated by Begg's and Egger's tests.

RESULTS

Nine retrospective studies including 1,650 patients were analyzed. Short-term outcomes suggested that the incidence rate of postoperative complications, including portal or splenic vein thrombosis [odds ratio (OR) =26.28, P<0.001] and pancreatic injury (OR =14.89, P=0.001), was significantly higher in the splenectomy group, whereas the perioperative mortality rate was similar between the splenectomy and non-splenectomy groups (P=0.541). Long-term outcomes indicated that the occurrence of variceal re-hemorrhage (OR =0.31, P<0.001) and tumor progress or recurrence (OR =0.62, P=0.001) was markedly reduced for patients who underwent splenectomy, while the long-term mortality rates were not statistically different between the two groups (P=0.087). The prognostic evaluation revealed that the OS and DFS were comparable between the splenectomy and non-splenectomy groups [for OS: hazard ratio (HR) =0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-1.13; for DFS: HR =0.87, 95% CI: 0.63-1.19]. Funnel plots suggested an HRs symmetric distribution for OS and DFS. Begg's and Egger's tests confirmed that there was no significant HR publication bias for OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the significant progress in surgical techniques and perioperative care, concomitant splenectomy should be considered as an optional treatment for some HCC patients with hypersplenism.