• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同质量等级猪五花肉和猪前腿肉理化及感官品质差异的研究

Investigation of Physicochemical and Sensory Quality Differences in Pork Belly and Shoulder Butt Cuts with Different Quality Grades.

作者信息

Hoa Van-Ba, Seol Kukhwan, Seo Hyunwoo, Kang Sunmoon, Kim Yunseok, Seong Pilnam, Moon Sungsil, Kim Jinhyoung, Cho Soohyun

机构信息

Animal Products Utilization Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea.

Sunjin Meat Research Center, Ansung 17532, Korea.

出版信息

Food Sci Anim Resour. 2021 Mar;41(2):224-236. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2020.e91. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

DOI:10.5851/kosfa.2020.e91
PMID:33987545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8115004/
Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of quality grade (QG) on the physicochemical composition and eating quality attributes of pork belly and shoulder butt. Seventy-two growing-finishing crossbred pigs were slaughtered and their carcasses were graded according to the Korean pork carcass grading system. Based on the grading criteria, the carcasses were classified into: QG 1 (n=23), QG 1 (n=23) and QG 2 (n=26) groups. At 24 h postmortem, belly and shoulder butt cuts were collected from the QG groups and used for analysis of meat quality, flavor compounds and eating quality attributes. Results showed that the variation in fat content among QG was approximately 2% in the both cut types. The QG showed no effects on all the quality traits: cooking loss, pH and color of the belly or shoulder butt (p>0.05). Thirty-five flavor compounds comprising mainly fatty acids oxidation/degradation-derived products (e.g., aldehydes) and only few Maillard reaction-derived products (e.g., sulfur-and nitrogen-containing compounds) were identified. However, the QG showed a minor effect on the flavor profiles in both the belly and shoulder butt. Regarding the sensory quality, no effects of the QG were found on all the eating quality attributes (color, flavor, juiciness, tenderness and acceptability) for both the belly and shoulder butt cuts (p>0.05). Thus, it may be concluded that the current pork carcass grading standards do not reflect the real quality and value of the belly and shoulder butt cuts.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查质量等级(QG)对猪肚和猪肩肉的理化成分及食用品质特性的影响。72头生长育肥杂交猪被屠宰,其胴体根据韩国猪肉胴体分级系统进行分级。根据分级标准,胴体被分为:QG 1组(n = 23)、QG 1组(n = 23)和QG 2组(n = 26)。宰后24小时,从QG组收集猪肚和猪肩肉切块,用于肉质、风味化合物和食用品质特性分析。结果表明,两种切块类型中QG间的脂肪含量差异约为2%。QG对所有质量性状均无影响:猪肚或猪肩肉的烹饪损失、pH值和颜色(p>0.05)。鉴定出35种风味化合物,主要包括脂肪酸氧化/降解衍生产物(如醛类),仅有少量美拉德反应衍生产物(如含硫和含氮化合物)。然而,QG对猪肚和猪肩肉的风味特征有轻微影响。关于感官品质,未发现QG对猪肚和猪肩肉切块的所有食用品质特性(颜色、风味、多汁性、嫩度和可接受性)有影响(p>0.05)。因此,可以得出结论,当前的猪肉胴体分级标准并未反映猪肚和猪肩肉切块的真实品质和价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cea3/8115004/e673db9868b9/kosfa-41-2-224-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cea3/8115004/e673db9868b9/kosfa-41-2-224-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cea3/8115004/e673db9868b9/kosfa-41-2-224-g1.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigation of Physicochemical and Sensory Quality Differences in Pork Belly and Shoulder Butt Cuts with Different Quality Grades.不同质量等级猪五花肉和猪前腿肉理化及感官品质差异的研究
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2021 Mar;41(2):224-236. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2020.e91. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
2
A study on shelf life of prepackaged retail-ready Korean native black pork belly and shoulder butt slices during refrigerated display.预包装即食韩国本土黑猪五花肉和肩胛肉片在冷藏展示期间的保质期研究
Anim Biosci. 2021 Dec;34(12):2012-2022. doi: 10.5713/ab.21.0172. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
3
Quality characteristics and flavor compounds of pork meat as a function of carcass quality grade.猪肉的品质特性和风味化合物与胴体品质等级的关系。
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019 Mar 7;32(9):1448-1457. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0965. Print 2019 Sep.
4
Meat quality characteristics of pork bellies in relation to fat level.猪腹部肉的肉质特性与脂肪水平的关系。
Anim Biosci. 2021 Oct;34(10):1663-1673. doi: 10.5713/ab.20.0612. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
5
Relationship between the pH of muscle and the quality properties of pork shoulder butt and belly slices.肌肉pH值与猪肩颈肉和五花肉片品质特性之间的关系。
Food Chem X. 2024 Jul 30;23:101704. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101704. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
6
Carcass traits, cut yields, and compositional end points in high-lean-yielding pork carcasses: effects of 10th rib backfat and loin eye area.高瘦肉率猪胴体的胴体性状、分割产量及成分指标:第10肋背膘厚和眼肌面积的影响
J Anim Sci. 2001 Jan;79(1):115-21. doi: 10.2527/2001.791115x.
7
Carcass trait, meat yield and quality characteristics of recently-synthesized Woori Heukdon and commercial LYD pigs under identical rearing condition.在相同饲养条件下,最近合成的伍里黑豚和商业LYD猪的胴体性状、产肉量和肉质特性。
Anim Biosci. 2023 Jun;36(6):943-952. doi: 10.5713/ab.22.0304. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
8
Comparison of Physicochemical and Functional Traits of Hanwoo Steer Beef by the Quality Grade.韩牛阉牛肉理化特性和功能特性按品质等级的比较
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2014;34(3):287-96. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.3.287. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
9
Quality characteristics, fatty acid profiles, flavor compounds and eating quality of cull sow meat in comparison with commercial pork.与商业猪肉相比,淘汰母猪肉的品质特性、脂肪酸谱、风味化合物及食用品质
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020 Apr;33(4):640-650. doi: 10.5713/ajas.19.0262. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
10
Effects of feeding diets containing increasing content of corn distillers dried grains with solubles to grower-finisher pigs on growth performance, carcass composition, and pork fat quality.饲粮中添加不同水平玉米干酒糟及其可溶物对生长育肥猪生长性能、胴体组成和猪肉脂肪品质的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2010 Apr;88(4):1398-410. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1404. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Fat Level and Excessive Fat Percentage of Retail-Ready Pork Belly Slices by Quality Grade.按质量等级划分的即食猪肚切片的脂肪含量和过高脂肪百分比
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2025 May;45(3):947-963. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2025.e29. Epub 2025 May 1.
2
Characterization of Key Aroma Compounds in Dongpo Pork Dish and Their Dynamic Changes During Storage.东坡肉中关键香气成分的表征及其在储存过程中的动态变化
Foods. 2025 Mar 21;14(7):1084. doi: 10.3390/foods14071084.
3
Quality Variation of Pork Bellies by Cutting Manner and Quality Grade.不同切割方式和品质等级下猪肚的品质差异

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Storage Stability, Volatile Compounds and Sensory Properties between Coarsely-and Finely-Marbled 1 Grade Hanwoo Beef Loins.粗大理石花纹和细大理石花纹1级韩国韩牛腰肉的储存稳定性、挥发性化合物及感官特性比较
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2020 Jul;40(4):497-511. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2020.e17. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
2
Quality characteristics, fatty acid profiles, flavor compounds and eating quality of cull sow meat in comparison with commercial pork.与商业猪肉相比,淘汰母猪肉的品质特性、脂肪酸谱、风味化合物及食用品质
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2020 Apr;33(4):640-650. doi: 10.5713/ajas.19.0262. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
3
Growth performance, carcass characteristics, fresh belly quality, and commercial bacon slicing yields of growing-finishing pigs from sire lines intended for different industry applications.
Foods. 2024 Sep 30;13(19):3129. doi: 10.3390/foods13193129.
4
Relationship between the pH of muscle and the quality properties of pork shoulder butt and belly slices.肌肉pH值与猪肩颈肉和五花肉片品质特性之间的关系。
Food Chem X. 2024 Jul 30;23:101704. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101704. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
5
Synbiotic-Glyconutrient Additive Reveals a Conducive Effect on Growth Performance, Fatty Acid Profile, Sensory Characteristics, and Texture Profile Analysis in Finishing Pig.合生元-糖营养素添加剂对育肥猪的生长性能、脂肪酸组成、感官特性和质地剖面分析显示出有益作用。
Foods. 2023 Dec 28;13(1):105. doi: 10.3390/foods13010105.
6
The potentials and challenges of using fermentation to improve the sensory quality of plant-based meat analogs.利用发酵改善植物基肉类替代品感官品质的潜力与挑战。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Oct 4;14:1267227. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1267227. eCollection 2023.
7
Carcass trait, meat yield and quality characteristics of recently-synthesized Woori Heukdon and commercial LYD pigs under identical rearing condition.在相同饲养条件下,最近合成的伍里黑豚和商业LYD猪的胴体性状、产肉量和肉质特性。
Anim Biosci. 2023 Jun;36(6):943-952. doi: 10.5713/ab.22.0304. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
8
Effect of Marination with Black Currant Juice on the Formation of Biogenic Amines in Pork Belly during Refrigerated Storage.用黑加仑汁腌制对冷藏猪肚中生物胺形成的影响。
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2021 Sep;41(5):763-778. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2021.e34. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
不同用途父系猪生长育肥猪的生长性能、胴体特征、新鲜腹部品质和商品培根切片产量。
Meat Sci. 2019 Aug;154:96-108. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
4
Quality characteristics and flavor compounds of pork meat as a function of carcass quality grade.猪肉的品质特性和风味化合物与胴体品质等级的关系。
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019 Mar 7;32(9):1448-1457. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0965. Print 2019 Sep.
5
Comparison of marbling fleck characteristics between beef marbling grades and its effect on sensory quality characteristics in high-marbled Hanwoo steer.比较高大理石花纹等级韩牛大理石花纹特征及其对感官质量特征的影响。
Meat Sci. 2019 Jun;152:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
6
Pork ham and belly quality can be estimated from loin quality measurements?从腰肉质量测量值可以估计猪肉火腿和腹部的质量吗?
Meat Sci. 2018 Nov;145:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.025. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
7
Meat flavour in pork and beef - From animal to meal.猪肉和牛肉中的肉香味——从动物到餐桌。
Meat Sci. 2017 Oct;132:112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
8
Generation of volatile compounds in Brazilian low-sodium dry fermented sausages containing blends of NaC1, KC1, and CaC1 during processing and storage.加工和储存过程中含氯化钠、氯化钾和氯化钙混合物的巴西低钠干发酵香肠中挥发性化合物的生成
Food Res Int. 2015 Aug;74:306-314. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.042. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
9
Compositional and dimensional factors influencing pork belly firmness.影响猪肚紧实度的成分和尺寸因素。
Meat Sci. 2017 Jul;129:54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
10
Pork loin quality is not indicative of fresh belly or fresh and cured ham quality.猪里脊肉的品质并不能代表五花肉或新鲜及腌制火腿的品质。
J Anim Sci. 2016 Dec;94(12):5155-5167. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016-0886.