• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猪肉加工过程中病原菌的转移率。

Transfer rates of pathogenic bacteria during pork processing.

作者信息

Park Jung Min, Koh Jong Ho, Cho Min Joo, Kim Jin Man

机构信息

Department of Food Marketing and Safety, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.

Department of Bio-Food Analysis, Bio-Campus, Korea Polytechnic University, Nonsan 32940, Korea.

出版信息

J Anim Sci Technol. 2020 Nov;62(6):912-921. doi: 10.5187/jast.2020.62.6.912. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

DOI:10.5187/jast.2020.62.6.912
PMID:33987571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7721579/
Abstract

We examined the rates of pathogenic bacterial cross-contamination from gloves to meat and from meat to gloves during pork processing under meat-handling scenarios in transfer rate experiments of inoculated pathogens. The inoculated pork contained ~5-6 Log CFU/g pathogenic bacteria like (), (), (), and subsp. (). On cotton gloves, after cutting the pork, the cutting board, knife, and cotton gloves showed 3.07-3.50, 3.29-3.92 and 4.48-4.86 Log CFU/g bacteria. However, when using polyethylene gloves, fewer bacteria (3.12-3.75, 3.20-3.33, and 3.07-3.97 Log CFU/g, respectively) were transferred. When four pathogens (6 Log CFU/g) were inoculated onto the gloves, polyethylene gloves showed a lower transition rate (cutting board 2.47-3.40, knife 2.01-3.98, and polyethylene glove 2.40-2.98 Log CFU/g) than cotton gloves. For cotton gloves, these values were 3.46-3.96, 3.37-4.06, and 3.55-4.00 Log CFU/g, respectively. Use of cotton gloves, polyethylene gloves, knives and cutting boards for up to 10 hours in a meat butchering environment has not exceeded HACCP regulations. However, after 10 h of use, 3.09, 3.27, and 2.94 Log CFU/g of plate count bacteria were detected on the cotton gloves, cutting board, and knives but polyethylene gloves showed no bacterial count. Our results reveal the transfer efficiency of pathogenic bacteria and that gloved hands may act as a transfer route of pathogenic bacteria between meat and hands. The best hand hygiene was achieved when wearing polyethylene gloves. Thus, use of polyethylene rather than cotton gloves reduces cross-contamination during meat processing.

摘要

在接种病原体的转移率实验中,我们研究了猪肉加工过程中,在肉类处理场景下病原菌从手套到肉类以及从肉类到手套的交叉污染率。接种的猪肉含有约5-6 Log CFU/g的病原菌,如()、()、()和亚种()。在棉手套上,切割猪肉后,砧板、刀具和棉手套上的细菌含量分别为3.07-3.50、3.29-3.92和4.48-4.86 Log CFU/g。然而,使用聚乙烯手套时,转移的细菌较少(分别为3.12-3.75、3.20-3.33和3.07-3.97 Log CFU/g)。当将四种病原体(6 Log CFU/g)接种到手套上时,聚乙烯手套的转移率(砧板2.47-3.40、刀具2.01-3.98和聚乙烯手套2.40-2.98 Log CFU/g)低于棉手套。对于棉手套,这些值分别为3.46-3.96、3.37-4.06和3.55-4.00 Log CFU/g。在肉类屠宰环境中,使用棉手套、聚乙烯手套、刀具和砧板长达10小时未超过HACCP规定。然而,使用10小时后,在棉手套、砧板和刀具上检测到平板计数细菌分别为3.09、3.27和2.94 Log CFU/g,但聚乙烯手套上未检测到细菌计数。我们的结果揭示了病原菌的转移效率,并且戴手套的手可能是病原菌在肉类和手之间的转移途径。佩戴聚乙烯手套时手部卫生状况最佳。因此,使用聚乙烯手套而非棉手套可减少肉类加工过程中的交叉污染。

相似文献

1
Transfer rates of pathogenic bacteria during pork processing.猪肉加工过程中病原菌的转移率。
J Anim Sci Technol. 2020 Nov;62(6):912-921. doi: 10.5187/jast.2020.62.6.912. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
2
Simulating Cross-Contamination of Cooked Pork with from Raw Pork through Home Kitchen Preparation in Vietnam.模拟越南家庭厨房准备生猪肉过程中交叉污染 cooked pork 的 。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 22;15(10):2324. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102324.
3
Effect of inoculum size, bacterial species, type of surfaces and contact time to the transfer of foodborne pathogens from inoculated to non-inoculated beef fillets via food processing surfaces.接种量、细菌种类、表面类型以及接触时间对食源性病原体通过食品加工表面从接种的牛肉里脊转移至未接种的牛肉里脊的影响。
Food Microbiol. 2017 Apr;62:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
4
Prevalence of pathogenic bacteria in street vended ready-to-eat meats in Windhoek, Namibia.纳米比亚温得和克街头出售的即食肉类中病原菌的流行情况。
Meat Sci. 2019 Feb;148:223-228. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
Microbial Quality and Safety of Sushi Prepared with Gloved or Bare Hands: Food Handlers' Impact on Retail Food Hygiene and Safety.戴手套或徒手制作寿司的微生物质量和安全性:食品处理人员对零售食品安全和卫生的影响。
J Food Prot. 2019 Apr;82(4):615-622. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-349.
6
Effects of wearing knitted or rubber gloves on the transfer of Escherichia cohi between hands and meat.佩戴针织手套或橡胶手套对双手与肉类之间大肠杆菌传播的影响。
J Food Prot. 2002 Jun;65(6):1045-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.1045.
7
Efficacy of Neutral Electrolyzed Water, Quaternary Ammonium and Lactic Acid-Based Solutions in Controlling Microbial Contamination of Food Cutting Boards Using a Manual Spraying Technique.采用手动喷雾技术,中性电解水、季铵盐和乳酸基溶液在控制食品切菜板微生物污染方面的效果。
J Food Sci. 2016 May;81(5):M1177-83. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13275. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
8
Assessment of the antibacterial activity of a triclosan-containing cutting board.评估含三氯生的切菜板的抗菌活性。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Mar 30;146(2):157-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.02.017. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
9
Transfer of Campylobacter and Salmonella from Poultry Meat onto Poultry Preparation Surfaces.弯曲杆菌和沙门氏菌从禽肉转移到家禽加工表面。
J Food Prot. 2017 May 1;80(5):750-757. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-414.
10
Development and evaluation of pullulan-based composite antimicrobial films (CAF) incorporated with nisin, thymol and lauric arginate to reduce foodborne pathogens associated with muscle foods.基于普鲁兰多糖的复合抗菌膜(CAF)的开发与评价,该膜中添加了乳链菌肽、百里香酚和月桂酰精氨酸乙酯盐,以减少与肌肉食品相关的食源性致病菌。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2020 May 2;320:108519. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108519. Epub 2020 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Foodborne Disease Outbreaks in the United States, 1973-1987: Pathogens, Vehicles, and Trends.美国1973 - 1987年食源性疾病暴发:病原体、传播媒介及趋势
J Food Prot. 1990 Sep;53(9):804-817. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-53.9.804.
2
Assessment of Microbial and Radioactive Contaminations in Korean Cold Duck Meats and Electron-Beam Application for Quality Improvement.韩国冷鸭肉中微生物和放射性污染的评估以及电子束对品质改善的应用
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2017;37(2):297-304. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.2.297. Epub 2017 Apr 30.
3
Adequate Hand Washing and Glove Use Are Necessary To Reduce Cross-Contamination from Hands with High Bacterial Loads.充分洗手和正确使用手套对于减少来自高细菌载量手部的交叉污染是必要的。
J Food Prot. 2016 Feb;79(2):304-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-342.
4
Use of Antimicrobial Food Additives as Potential Dipping Solutions to Control Pseudomonas spp. Contamination in the Frankfurters and Ham.使用抗菌食品添加剂作为潜在的浸渍溶液来控制法兰克福香肠和火腿中的假单胞菌属污染。
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2014;34(5):591-6. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.5.591. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
5
Perception of the HACCP system operators on livestock product manufacturers.HACCP 系统操作人员对畜产品生产企业的认知。
J Anim Sci Technol. 2014 Sep 24;56:19. doi: 10.1186/2055-0391-56-19. eCollection 2014.
6
A 3-year hygiene and safety monitoring of a meat processing plant which uses raw materials of global origin.对一家使用全球原材料的肉类加工厂进行了为期 3 年的卫生和安全监测。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2015 Sep 16;209:60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.12.028. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
7
The effect of glove material upon the transfer of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to and from a gloved hand.手套材质对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌在戴手套的手与外界之间传递的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Jan;41(1):19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.017. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
8
Assessing the cross contamination and transfer rates of Salmonella enterica from chicken to lettuce under different food-handling scenarios.评估不同食品处理场景下,沙门氏菌从鸡肉到生菜的交叉污染和转移率。
Food Microbiol. 2010 Sep;27(6):791-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
9
Probabilistic risk model for staphylococcal intoxication from pork-based food dishes prepared in food service establishments in Korea.韩国食品服务机构制备的猪肉类菜肴中葡萄球菌中毒的概率风险模型。
J Food Prot. 2009 Sep;72(9):1897-908. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-72.9.1897.
10
Bidirectional Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium transfer between bare/glove hands and green bell pepper and its interruption.
Int J Environ Health Res. 2007 Oct;17(5):381-8. doi: 10.1080/09603120701372664.