Park Jung Min, Koh Jong Ho, Cho Min Joo, Kim Jin Man
Department of Food Marketing and Safety, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
Department of Bio-Food Analysis, Bio-Campus, Korea Polytechnic University, Nonsan 32940, Korea.
J Anim Sci Technol. 2020 Nov;62(6):912-921. doi: 10.5187/jast.2020.62.6.912. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
We examined the rates of pathogenic bacterial cross-contamination from gloves to meat and from meat to gloves during pork processing under meat-handling scenarios in transfer rate experiments of inoculated pathogens. The inoculated pork contained ~5-6 Log CFU/g pathogenic bacteria like (), (), (), and subsp. (). On cotton gloves, after cutting the pork, the cutting board, knife, and cotton gloves showed 3.07-3.50, 3.29-3.92 and 4.48-4.86 Log CFU/g bacteria. However, when using polyethylene gloves, fewer bacteria (3.12-3.75, 3.20-3.33, and 3.07-3.97 Log CFU/g, respectively) were transferred. When four pathogens (6 Log CFU/g) were inoculated onto the gloves, polyethylene gloves showed a lower transition rate (cutting board 2.47-3.40, knife 2.01-3.98, and polyethylene glove 2.40-2.98 Log CFU/g) than cotton gloves. For cotton gloves, these values were 3.46-3.96, 3.37-4.06, and 3.55-4.00 Log CFU/g, respectively. Use of cotton gloves, polyethylene gloves, knives and cutting boards for up to 10 hours in a meat butchering environment has not exceeded HACCP regulations. However, after 10 h of use, 3.09, 3.27, and 2.94 Log CFU/g of plate count bacteria were detected on the cotton gloves, cutting board, and knives but polyethylene gloves showed no bacterial count. Our results reveal the transfer efficiency of pathogenic bacteria and that gloved hands may act as a transfer route of pathogenic bacteria between meat and hands. The best hand hygiene was achieved when wearing polyethylene gloves. Thus, use of polyethylene rather than cotton gloves reduces cross-contamination during meat processing.
在接种病原体的转移率实验中,我们研究了猪肉加工过程中,在肉类处理场景下病原菌从手套到肉类以及从肉类到手套的交叉污染率。接种的猪肉含有约5-6 Log CFU/g的病原菌,如()、()、()和亚种()。在棉手套上,切割猪肉后,砧板、刀具和棉手套上的细菌含量分别为3.07-3.50、3.29-3.92和4.48-4.86 Log CFU/g。然而,使用聚乙烯手套时,转移的细菌较少(分别为3.12-3.75、3.20-3.33和3.07-3.97 Log CFU/g)。当将四种病原体(6 Log CFU/g)接种到手套上时,聚乙烯手套的转移率(砧板2.47-3.40、刀具2.01-3.98和聚乙烯手套2.40-2.98 Log CFU/g)低于棉手套。对于棉手套,这些值分别为3.46-3.96、3.37-4.06和3.55-4.00 Log CFU/g。在肉类屠宰环境中,使用棉手套、聚乙烯手套、刀具和砧板长达10小时未超过HACCP规定。然而,使用10小时后,在棉手套、砧板和刀具上检测到平板计数细菌分别为3.09、3.27和2.94 Log CFU/g,但聚乙烯手套上未检测到细菌计数。我们的结果揭示了病原菌的转移效率,并且戴手套的手可能是病原菌在肉类和手之间的转移途径。佩戴聚乙烯手套时手部卫生状况最佳。因此,使用聚乙烯手套而非棉手套可减少肉类加工过程中的交叉污染。