Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Jul;25(7):865-874. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02444-5. Epub 2021 May 13.
The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of the duodenum-first multidirectional approach (DMA) in laparoscopic right colectomy with those of the conventional medial approach to assess its safety and feasibility.
This retrospective study enrolled 120 patients who had laparoscopic surgery for right-sided colon cancer in our institution between April 2013 and December 2019. Fifty-four patients underwent colectomy using the multidirectional approach; among these, 20 underwent the DMA and 34 underwent the caudal-first multidirectional approach (CMA). Sixty-six patients underwent the conventional medial approach. Complications within 30 days of surgery were compared between the groups.
There were 54 patients in the multidirectional group [29 females, median age 72 years (range 36-91 years)] and 66 in the medial group [42 females, median age 72 years (range 41-91 years)]. Total operative time was significantly shorter in multidirectional approach patients than conventional medial approach patients (208 min vs. 271 min; p = 0.01) and significantly shorter in patients who underwent the DMA compared to the CMA (201 min vs. 269 min; p < 0.001). Operative time for the mobilization procedure was also significantly shorter in patients who underwent the DMA (131 min vs. 181 min; p < 0.001). Blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications did not differ. In 77 patients with advanced T3/T4 tumors, the DMA, CMA, and conventional medial approach were performed in 13, 21, and 43 patients, respectively. Total operative time and operative time of the mobilization procedure were significantly shorter in patients undergoing DMA. Blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications did not differ. R0 resection was achieved in all patients with advanced tumors.
The DMA in laparoscopic right colectomy is safe and feasible and can achieve R0 resection with a shorter operative time than the conventional medial approach, even in patients with advanced tumors.
本研究旨在比较腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中十二指肠优先多方向入路(DMA)与传统中间入路的短期结果,以评估其安全性和可行性。
本回顾性研究纳入 2013 年 4 月至 2019 年 12 月在我院接受腹腔镜右半结肠癌手术的 120 例患者。54 例患者行多方向切除术;其中 20 例行 DMA,34 例行尾部优先多方向入路(CMA)。66 例行传统中间入路。比较两组患者术后 30 天内的并发症。
多向组 54 例患者[29 例女性,中位年龄 72 岁(范围 36-91 岁)],中间组 66 例患者[42 例女性,中位年龄 72 岁(范围 41-91 岁)]。多向组患者的总手术时间明显短于中间组(208min 比 271min;p=0.01),行 DMA 患者的手术时间明显短于行 CMA 患者(201min 比 269min;p<0.001)。行 DMA 患者的游离操作时间也明显短于行 CMA 患者(131min 比 181min;p<0.001)。术中出血量和术后并发症发生率无差异。在 77 例进展期 T3/T4 肿瘤患者中,分别有 13 例、21 例和 43 例患者行 DMA、CMA 和传统中间入路。行 DMA 患者的总手术时间和游离操作时间明显缩短。术中出血量和术后并发症发生率无差异。所有进展期肿瘤患者均达到 R0 切除。
腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中的 DMA 是安全可行的,即使在进展期肿瘤患者中,也能达到 R0 切除,且手术时间短于传统中间入路。