• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用 Rasch 分析开发简化版 CPAI-A(B 型)。

Development of a Short Form of the CPAI-A (Form B) with Rasch Analyses.

机构信息

Weiqiao Fan, Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, No.100 Guilin Rd., Shanghai, 200234, China,

出版信息

J Appl Meas. 2020;21(4):515-532.

PMID:33989203
Abstract

The present study developed and validated a short form of the Cross-Cultural (Chinese) Personality Assessment Inventory for adolescents (CPAI-A; Form B) focusing on the personality scales by unidimensional and multidimensional Rasch models. Multiple evidence from unidimensional Rasch models (item fit, DIF statistics, dimensionality, reliability indices, construct coverage) were evaluated in order to create a short scale with optimal psychometric properties. Further, multidimensional Rasch model, canonical analysis, and predictive validity were performed and evaluated to validate the CPAI-A-SF further. As a result, 65 of 277 items were selected in the short measure with a four-dimensional structure. The infit and outfit mean-squares (MNSQ) of the personality scale items ranged between .81 and 1.25. Good construct coverage was displayed on the item-person map, and all four dimensions demonstrate reasonable EAP/PV reliability ranging from .81 to .87. The personality scores of CPAI-A-SF predicted life satisfaction as well as the scores from the original inventory.

摘要

本研究采用一维和多维 Rasch 模型,开发并验证了青少年跨文化(中文)人格评估量表(CPAI-A;B 型)的简短形式,重点是人格量表。为了创建具有最佳心理测量特性的简短量表,从一维 Rasch 模型(项目拟合、DIF 统计、维度、信度指标、结构覆盖)中评估了多种证据。此外,还进行了多维 Rasch 模型、典型分析和预测有效性分析,以进一步验证 CPAI-A-SF。结果,在具有四维结构的简短量表中选择了 277 个项目中的 65 个。人格量表项目的 infit 和 outfit 均方根(MNSQ)在.81 和 1.25 之间。项目-人图谱上显示出良好的结构覆盖,所有四个维度的 EAP/PV 可靠性均合理,范围在.81 到.87 之间。CPAI-A-SF 的人格得分预测了生活满意度以及原始量表的得分。

相似文献

1
Development of a Short Form of the CPAI-A (Form B) with Rasch Analyses.采用 Rasch 分析开发简化版 CPAI-A(B 型)。
J Appl Meas. 2020;21(4):515-532.
2
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
3
Health behavior inventory - short form: a Chinese validation study using classical test theory and item response theory.健康行为量表-简式中文版:基于经典测量理论和项目反应理论的验证性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 22;24(1):2281. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19774-2.
4
Construct Validity of the Spanish Versions of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form and Condensed Form: Rasch Analysis of Responses in Oncology Outpatients.《纪念症状评估量表短式和简式西班牙文版的建构效度:肿瘤门诊患者反应的 Rasch 分析》
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jun;55(6):1480-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
5
Short Forms of the Cross-Cultural (Chinese) Personality Assessment Inventory: Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance Across Gender.跨文化(中文)人格评估量表的简版:信度、效度及性别间的测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 15;12:709032. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709032. eCollection 2021.
6
Psychometric properties of the Malay version of the Women's Views of Birth Labour Satisfaction Questionnaire using the Rasch measurement model: a cross sectional study.使用 Rasch 测量模型评估马来语版女性分娩满意度问卷的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 14;20(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02975-z.
7
Is the Patient Activation Measure a valid measure of osteoarthritis self-management attitudes and capabilities? Results of a Rasch analysis.患者激活度量表(PAM)是否能有效测量骨关节炎自我管理的态度和能力?一项 Rasch 分析的结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 5;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01364-6.
8
[Rasch analysis of the Chinese Version of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire].[低视力生活质量问卷中文版的拉施分析]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 11;55(8):582-588. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2019.08.007.
9
An Examination of Sensitivity to Measurement Error in Rasch Residual-based Fit Statistics.基于拉施残差的拟合统计量对测量误差的敏感性检验。
J Appl Meas. 2019;20(4):354-366.
10
Rasch Analysis of Reliability and Validity of Scores From the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).足踝功能测量表(FAAM)得分的信度和效度的 Rasch 分析。
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Feb;41(2):229-236. doi: 10.1177/1071100719884554. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
West Meets East in a New Two-Polarities Model of Personality: Combining Self-Relatedness Structure With Independent-Interdependent Functions.西方与东方在一种新的两极化人格模型中相遇:将自我关联结构与独立-互依功能相结合。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 17;12:739900. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739900. eCollection 2021.
2
Short Forms of the Cross-Cultural (Chinese) Personality Assessment Inventory: Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance Across Gender.跨文化(中文)人格评估量表的简版:信度、效度及性别间的测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 15;12:709032. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709032. eCollection 2021.