Key Lab of Food Quality and Safety of Jiangsu Province - State Key Laboratory Breeding, Base, Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China; Fungal Physiology, Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute & Fungal Molecular Physiology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Key Laboratory of Plant Immunity, Fungal Genomics Laboratory (FungiG), Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China; Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering (ICEBE), TU Wien, Austria.
Biotechnol Adv. 2021 Sep-Oct;50:107770. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107770. Epub 2021 May 11.
In this review, we argue that there is much to be learned by transferring knowledge from research on lignocellulose degradation to that on plastic. Plastic waste accumulates in the environment to hazardous levels, because it is inherently recalcitrant to biological degradation. Plants evolved lignocellulose to be resistant to degradation, but with time, fungi became capable of utilising it for their nutrition. Examples of how fungal strategies to degrade lignocellulose could be insightful for plastic degradation include how fungi overcome the hydrophobicity of lignin (e.g. production of hydrophobins) and crystallinity of cellulose (e.g. oxidative approaches). In parallel, knowledge of the methods for understanding lignocellulose degradation could be insightful such as advanced microscopy, genomic and post-genomic approaches (e.g. gene expression analysis). The known limitations of biological lignocellulose degradation, such as the necessity for physiochemical pretreatments for biofuel production, can be predictive of potential restrictions of biological plastic degradation. Taking lessons from lignocellulose degradation for plastic degradation is also important for biosafety as engineered plastic-degrading fungi could also have increased plant biomass degrading capabilities. Even though plastics are significantly different from lignocellulose because they lack hydrolysable C-C or C-O bonds and therefore have higher recalcitrance, there are apparent similarities, e.g. both types of compounds are mixtures of hydrophobic polymers with amorphous and crystalline regions, and both require hydrolases and oxidoreductases for their degradation. Thus, many lessons could be learned from fungal lignocellulose degradation.
在这篇综述中,我们认为,从木质纤维素降解的研究中转移知识到塑料研究中,可以学到很多东西。塑料废物在环境中积累到危险水平,因为它本质上难以生物降解。植物进化出木质纤维素来抵抗降解,但随着时间的推移,真菌变得能够利用它来获取营养。真菌降解木质纤维素的策略如何为塑料降解提供启示的例子包括真菌如何克服木质素的疏水性(例如产生疏水性蛋白)和纤维素的结晶度(例如氧化方法)。与此同时,了解木质纤维素降解的方法也很有见地,例如高级显微镜、基因组和后基因组方法(例如基因表达分析)。生物木质纤维素降解的已知局限性,例如生物燃料生产所需的物理化学预处理,可以预测生物塑料降解的潜在限制。从木质纤维素降解中吸取教训来降解塑料,对于生物安全也很重要,因为工程化的塑料降解真菌也可能具有增强的植物生物质降解能力。尽管塑料与木质纤维素有很大的不同,因为它们缺乏可水解的 C-C 或 C-O 键,因此具有更高的抗降解性,但它们显然有一些相似之处,例如这两种化合物都是疏水性聚合物的混合物,具有无定形和结晶区,都需要水解酶和氧化还原酶来降解。因此,真菌木质纤维素降解可以提供许多经验教训。