• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前往高容量中心的旅行时间会对直肠癌的治疗时机产生负面影响。

Travel Time to a High Volume Center Negatively Impacts Timing of Care in Rectal Cancer.

机构信息

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts.

Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2021 Oct;266:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.056. Epub 2021 May 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.056
PMID:33989893
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regionalization of rectal cancer surgery may lead to worse disease free survival owing to longer travel time to reach a high volume center yet no study has evaluated this relationship at a single high volume center volume center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review of rectal cancer patients undergoing surgery from 2009 to 2019 at a single high volume center. Patients were divided into two groups based on travel time. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Additional outcomes included treatment within 60 d of diagnosis, completeness of preoperative staging, and evaluation by a colorectal surgeon prior to initiation of treatment.

RESULTS

A lower proportion of patients with long travel time began definitive treatment within 60 d of diagnosis (74.0% versus 84.0%, P= 0.01) or were seen by the treating colorectal surgeon before beginning definitive treatment (74.8% versus 85.4%, P < 0.01). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients with long travel time were significantly less likely to begin definitive treatment within 60 d of diagnosis (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.31-0.93) or to be evaluated by a colorectal surgeon prior to initiating treatment (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.25-0.80). There were no significant differences in DFS based on travel time.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with long travel times may be vulnerable to delayed, lower quality rectal cancer care, there is no difference in DFS when definitive surgery is performed at a high volume canter. Ongoing research is needed to identify explanations for delays in treatment to ensure all patients receive the highest quality care.

摘要

背景

直肠癌手术的区域化可能导致无病生存率较差,因为到达高容量中心的旅行时间较长,但尚无研究在单一高容量中心评估这种关系。

材料和方法

这是对单一高容量中心 2009 年至 2019 年期间接受手术的直肠癌患者进行的回顾性研究。根据旅行时间将患者分为两组。主要结果是无病生存(DFS)。其他结果包括在诊断后 60 天内进行治疗、术前分期的完整性以及在开始治疗前由结直肠外科医生进行评估。

结果

较长旅行时间的患者中,开始确定性治疗的比例较低(74.0%比 84.0%,P=0.01)或在开始确定性治疗前接受治疗结直肠外科医生的评估比例较低(74.8%比 85.4%,P<0.01)。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,较长旅行时间的患者开始确定性治疗的可能性明显较低(OR=0.54;95%CI=0.31-0.93)或在开始治疗前接受结直肠外科医生评估的可能性较低(OR=0.45;95%CI=0.25-0.80)。根据旅行时间,DFS 没有显著差异。

结论

尽管旅行时间较长的患者可能面临直肠癌治疗延迟和质量降低的风险,但在高容量中心进行确定性手术时,DFS 没有差异。需要开展进一步研究以确定治疗延迟的原因,以确保所有患者都能获得最高质量的护理。

相似文献

1
Travel Time to a High Volume Center Negatively Impacts Timing of Care in Rectal Cancer.前往高容量中心的旅行时间会对直肠癌的治疗时机产生负面影响。
J Surg Res. 2021 Oct;266:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.056. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
Fragmented Care in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer and Time to Definitive Therapy.直肠癌治疗中的碎片化护理与明确治疗时机。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jan;232(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
3
Impact of Travel Distance and Urban-Rural Status on the Multidisciplinary Management of Rectal Cancer.旅行距离和城乡状况对直肠癌多学科管理的影响。
J Rural Health. 2017 Sep;33(4):393-401. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12219. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
4
Is the Distance Worth It? Patients With Rectal Cancer Traveling to High-Volume Centers Experience Improved Outcomes.这段距离值得吗?前往高容量中心就医的直肠癌患者预后更佳。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Dec;60(12):1250-1259. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000924.
5
The Impact of Delays to Definitive Surgical Care on Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients.延迟确定性手术治疗对结直肠癌患者生存的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jan;24(1):115-122. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04328-4. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.前往高容量中心就医与食管癌患者生存率提高相关。
Ann Surg. 2017 Apr;265(4):743-749. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001702.
7
Travel distance, hospital volume and their association with ovarian cancer short- and long-term outcomes.旅行距离、医院容量及其与卵巢癌短期和长期结局的关系。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):415-423. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 May 23.
8
Evaluation of Access to Hospitals Most Ready to Achieve National Accreditation for Rectal Cancer Treatment.评估最有资格获得直肠癌治疗国家认证的医院的准入情况。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jun 1;154(6):516-523. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5521.
9
Impact of travel time and rurality on presentation and outcomes of symptomatic colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional cohort study in primary care.出行时间和乡村地区对有症状结直肠癌的就诊及治疗结果的影响:一项初级保健中的横断面队列研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jul;67(660):e460-e466. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X691349. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
10
Associations Between Travel Distance, Hospital Volume, and Outcomes Following Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者根治性膀胱切除术后旅行距离、医院手术量与预后的相关性
Urology. 2018 Apr;114:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.12.014. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Simulated Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Surgery at the Highest-Performing vs Chosen Local Hospitals.最高绩效医院与选择的当地医院结直肠癌手术模拟结果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255999. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55999.