• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌治疗中的碎片化护理与明确治疗时机。

Fragmented Care in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer and Time to Definitive Therapy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jan;232(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.10.017
PMID:33190785
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach for treating rectal cancer and has developed performance measures to ensure that patients receive standardized care. We hypothesized that rectal cancer patients receiving care at multiple centers would be less likely to receive timely and appropriate care.

STUDY DESIGN

A single institution retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. All patients undergoing proctectomy and ≤1 other treatment modality (eg radiation and/or chemotherapy) for Stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma were included. Unified care was defined as receiving all modalities of care at our institution, and fragmented care was defined as having at least 1 treatment modality at another institution.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2019, 415 patients met inclusion criteria, with 197 (47.5%) receiving fragmented care and 218 (52.5%) receiving unified care. The unified cohort patients were more likely to see a colorectal surgeon before starting treatment (89.0% vs 78.7%, p < 0.01) and start definitive treatment within 60 days of diagnosis (89.0% vs 79.7%, p = 0.01). On adjusted analysis, unified care patients were 2.78 times more likely to see a surgeon before starting treatment (95% CI 1.47-5.24) and 2.63 times more likely to start treatment within 60 days (95% CI 1.35-5.13). There was no difference in 90-day mortality or 5-year disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective cohort study suggests patients with rectal cancer receiving fragmented care are at an increased risk of delays in care without any impact on disease-free survival. These findings need to be considered within the context of ongoing regionalization of rectal cancer care to ensure all patients receive optimal care, irrespective of whether care is delivered across multiple institutions.

摘要

背景

国家直肠癌认证计划(NAPRC)强调多学科方法治疗直肠癌,并制定了绩效指标以确保患者接受标准化治疗。我们假设在多个中心接受治疗的直肠癌患者不太可能获得及时和适当的治疗。

研究设计

对前瞻性维护的数据库进行了单机构回顾性研究。所有接受 II/III 期直肠腺癌直肠切除术和≤1 种其他治疗方式(如放疗和/或化疗)的患者均纳入研究。统一治疗是指在本机构接受所有治疗方式,而分散治疗是指在其他机构接受至少 1 种治疗方式。

结果

2009 年至 2019 年,共有 415 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 197 名(47.5%)接受分散治疗,218 名(52.5%)接受统一治疗。统一治疗组的患者在开始治疗前更有可能见到结直肠外科医生(89.0%比 78.7%,p<0.01),并在诊断后 60 天内开始确定性治疗(89.0%比 79.7%,p=0.01)。在调整分析中,统一治疗组患者在开始治疗前见到外科医生的可能性是前者的 2.78 倍(95%CI 1.47-5.24),在 60 天内开始治疗的可能性是前者的 2.63 倍(95%CI 1.35-5.13)。90 天死亡率和 5 年无病生存率无差异。

结论

本回顾性队列研究表明,接受分散治疗的直肠癌患者在治疗延迟方面风险增加,但对无病生存率没有影响。在直肠癌治疗区域化的背景下,需要考虑这些发现,以确保所有患者无论治疗机构数量如何,都能获得最佳治疗。

相似文献

1
Fragmented Care in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer and Time to Definitive Therapy.直肠癌治疗中的碎片化护理与明确治疗时机。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jan;232(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
2
Travel Time to a High Volume Center Negatively Impacts Timing of Care in Rectal Cancer.前往高容量中心的旅行时间会对直肠癌的治疗时机产生负面影响。
J Surg Res. 2021 Oct;266:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.056. Epub 2021 May 11.
3
Evaluation of Access to Hospitals Most Ready to Achieve National Accreditation for Rectal Cancer Treatment.评估最有资格获得直肠癌治疗国家认证的医院的准入情况。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jun 1;154(6):516-523. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5521.
4
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience.局部进展期直肠癌患者的辅助化疗应用:单中心经验。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020 Sep;19(3):e124-e128. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
5
Association of National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer Accreditation with Outcomes after Rectal Cancer Surgery.国家直肠癌认证计划认证与直肠癌手术后结局的关联。
J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Aug 1;239(2):98-105. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001064. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
6
Could meeting the standards of the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer in the National Cancer Database improve patient outcomes?在国家癌症数据库中达到直肠癌国家认证计划的标准是否能改善患者的预后?
Colorectal Dis. 2023 May;25(5):916-922. doi: 10.1111/codi.16503. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
7
Evaluating the Current Status of Rectal Cancer Care in the US: Where We Stand at the Start of the Commission on Cancer's National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer.评估美国直肠癌治疗现状:美国癌症委员会直肠癌全国认证计划启动之初的现状。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 May;226(5):881-890. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.01.057. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
Definitive Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer: Is There a Role for Dose Escalation? A National Cancer Database Study.直肠癌的放化疗:是否有剂量递增的作用?一项国家癌症数据库研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Nov;62(11):1336-1343. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001468.
9
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.丹麦结直肠癌的生存情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428.
10
Association Between Incomplete Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Survival for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.局部晚期直肠癌患者新辅助放疗不完整与生存之间的关联
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jun 1;152(6):558-564. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0010.

引用本文的文献

1
Fragmentation of Multimodal Rectal Cancer Care: A Population-Level Retrospective Cohort Study.多模式直肠癌护理的碎片化:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul;132(1):135-145. doi: 10.1002/jso.28163. Epub 2025 May 23.
2
Fragmented Care and Guideline-Concordant Treatment in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.局部晚期宫颈癌的碎片化护理与指南一致的治疗
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr 1;145(4):387-394. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005869. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
3
NCCN guideline concordance in colon and rectal cancer patients within a comprehensive health system.
综合医疗系统中结肠癌和直肠癌患者的NCCN指南一致性
Am J Surg. 2025 Feb;240:116114. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116114. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
4
Evaluation of an Italian Population-Based Programme for Risk Assessment and Genetic Counselling and Testing for BRCA1/2-Related Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer after 10 Years of Operation: An Observational Study Protocol.一项基于意大利人群的BRCA1/2相关遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险评估、遗传咨询及检测项目运营10年后的评估:一项观察性研究方案
Methods Protoc. 2024 Aug 13;7(4):63. doi: 10.3390/mps7040063.
5
Influence of Health Insurance Types on Clinical Cancer Care Accessibility and Quality Using Database.利用数据库研究医疗保险类型对临床癌症护理可及性和质量的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 11;60(4):623. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040623.
6
The Impact of Age in the Treatment of Non-comorbid Patients with Rectal Cancer: Survival Outcomes from the National Cancer Database.年龄对非共病直肠癌患者治疗的影响:来自国家癌症数据库的生存结果。
World J Surg. 2023 Aug;47(8):2023-2038. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07008-2. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
7
Does fragmented cancer care affect survival? Analysis of gastric cancer patients using national insurance claim data.碎片化的癌症治疗是否会影响生存?基于国民保险索赔数据的胃癌患者分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 21;22(1):1566. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08988-y.
8
Care Fragmentation in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.分化型甲状腺癌患者的护理碎片化。
World J Surg. 2022 Dec;46(12):3007-3016. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06712-9. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
9
Assessment of short readmissions following elective pulmonary lobectomy.择期性肺叶切除术后短期再入院评估。
Am J Surg. 2023 Jan;225(1):220-225. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.07.031. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
The Variations in Care and Real-world Outcomes in Individuals With Rectal Cancer: Protocol for the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort.直肠癌患者护理及实际治疗结果的差异:安大略直肠癌队列研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Aug 5;11(8):e38874. doi: 10.2196/38874.