Lee Mark, Rivera-Rosario Hazel T, Kim Matthew H, Bewley Gregory P, Wang Jane, Warhaft Zellman, Stylman Bradley, Park Angela I, MacMahon Aoife, Kacker Ashutosh, Schwartz Theodore H
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York.
2Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca; and.
J Neurosurg. 2021 May 14;135(6):1825-1832. doi: 10.3171/2020.10.JNS202745. Print 2021 Dec 1.
The authors developed a negative-pressure, patient face-mounted antechamber and tested its efficacy as a tool for sequestering aerated particles and improving the safety of endonasal surgical procedures.
Antechamber prototyping was performed with 3D printing and silicone-elastomer molding. The lowest vacuum settings needed to meet specifications for class I biosafety cabinets (flow rate ≥ 0.38 m/sec) were determined using an anemometer. A cross-validation approach with two different techniques, optical particle sizing and high-speed videography/shadowgraphy, was used to identify the minimum pressures required to sequester aerosolized materials. At the minimum vacuum settings identified, physical parameters were quantified, including flow rate, antechamber pressure, and time to clearance.
The minimum tube pressures needed to meet specifications for class I biosafety cabinets were -1.0 and -14.5 mm Hg for the surgical chambers with ("closed face") and without ("open face") the silicone diaphragm covering the operative port, respectively. Optical particle sizing did not detect aerosol generation from surgical drilling at these vacuum settings; however, videography estimated higher thresholds required to contain aerosols, at -6 and -35 mm Hg. Simulation of surgical movement disrupted aerosol containment visualized by shadowgraphy in the open-faced but not the closed-faced version of the mask; however, the closed-face version of the mask required increased negative pressure (-15 mm Hg) to contain aerosols during surgical simulation.
Portable, negative-pressure surgical compartments can contain aerosols from surgical drilling with pressures attainable by standard hospital and clinic vacuums. Future studies are needed to carefully consider the reliability of different techniques for detecting aerosols.
作者开发了一种负压、患者面部佩戴的前室,并测试其作为隔离充气颗粒和提高鼻内手术安全性工具的功效。
采用3D打印和硅橡胶成型进行前室原型制作。使用风速计确定达到I级生物安全柜规格(流速≥0.38米/秒)所需的最低真空设置。采用光学粒子尺寸测量和高速摄像/阴影成像两种不同技术的交叉验证方法,确定隔离雾化材料所需的最小压力。在确定的最低真空设置下,对包括流速、前室压力和清除时间在内的物理参数进行量化。
对于覆盖手术端口有(“封闭面部”)和没有(“开放面部”)硅树脂隔膜的手术腔室,达到I级生物安全柜规格所需的最小管压力分别为-1.0和-14.5毫米汞柱。在这些真空设置下,光学粒子尺寸测量未检测到手术钻孔产生的气溶胶;然而,摄像估计遏制气溶胶所需的阈值更高,分别为-6和-35毫米汞柱。手术动作模拟破坏了开放面而非封闭面口罩中通过阴影成像可视化的气溶胶遏制;然而,在手术模拟期间,封闭面口罩需要增加负压(-15毫米汞柱)来遏制气溶胶。
便携式负压手术隔室可以用标准医院和诊所真空所能达到的压力来遏制手术钻孔产生的气溶胶。未来需要开展研究,仔细考虑检测气溶胶的不同技术的可靠性。