Sharma Dhruv, Campiti Vincent J, Ye Michael J, Rubel Kolin E, Higgins Thomas S, Wu Arthur W, Shipchandler Taha Z, Burgin Sarah J, Sim Michael W, Illing Elisa A, Park Jae Hong, Ting Jonathan Y
Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA.
Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan 14;6(1):49-57. doi: 10.1002/lio2.520. eCollection 2021 Feb.
Cadaveric simulations have shown endonasal drilling and cautery generate aerosols, which is a significant concern for otolaryngologists during the COVID-19 era. This study quantifies aerosol generation during routine rhinologic surgeries and in-office procedures in live patients.
Aerosols ranging from 0.30 to 10.0 μm were measured in real-time using an optical particle sizer during surgeries and in-office procedures. Various mask conditions were tested during rigid nasal endoscopy (RNE) and postoperative debridement (POD).
Higher aerosol concentrations (AC) ranging from 2.69 to 10.0 μm were measured during RNE ( = 9) with no mask vs two mask conditions ( = .002 and = .017). Mean AC (0.30-10.0 μm) were significantly higher during POD (n = 9) for no mask vs a mask covering the patient's mouth condition (mean difference = 0.16 ± 0.03 particles/cm, 95% CI 0.10-0.22, < .001). There were no discernible spikes in aerosol levels during endoscopic septoplasty (n = 3). Aerosol spikes were measured in two of three functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESS) with microdebrider. Using suction mitigation, there were no discernible spikes during powered drilling in two anterior skull base surgeries (ASBS).
Use of a surgical mask over the patient's mouth during in-office procedures or a mask with a slit for an endoscope during RNE significantly diminished aerosol generation. However, whether this reduction in aerosol generation is sufficient to prevent transmission of communicable diseases via aerosols was beyond the scope of this study. There were several spikes in aerosols during FESS and ASBS, though none were associated with endonasal drilling with the use of suction mitigation.
尸体模拟研究表明,鼻内钻孔和烧灼会产生气溶胶,这在新冠疫情期间是耳鼻喉科医生极为关注的问题。本研究对活体患者在常规鼻科手术及门诊操作过程中产生的气溶胶进行了量化。
在手术及门诊操作过程中,使用光学粒子计数器实时测量直径范围为0.30至10.0μm的气溶胶。在硬性鼻内镜检查(RNE)和术后清创(POD)期间测试了各种口罩条件。
在无口罩与两种口罩条件下进行RNE(n = 9)时,测量到直径范围为2.69至10.0μm的气溶胶浓度更高(P = 0.002和P = 0.017)。在POD(n = 9)期间,无口罩与仅覆盖患者口腔的口罩条件相比,平均气溶胶浓度(0.30 - 10.0μm)显著更高(平均差异 = 0.16±0.03颗粒/cm,95%CI 0.10 - 0.22,P < 0.001)。在内镜鼻中隔成形术(n = 3)期间,气溶胶水平没有明显峰值。在三例使用微型清创器的功能性内镜鼻窦手术(FESS)中有两例测量到气溶胶峰值。在两个前颅底手术(ASBS)中,使用吸力减轻装置后,动力钻孔期间没有明显峰值。
在门诊操作期间在患者口腔上使用外科口罩或在RNE期间使用带有内镜狭缝的口罩可显著减少气溶胶产生。然而,这种气溶胶产生的减少是否足以预防通过气溶胶传播传染病超出了本研究的范围。在FESS和ASBS期间有几个气溶胶峰值,尽管没有一个与使用吸力减轻装置的鼻内钻孔相关。
4级