• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围手术期医学出版物中的欺诈和撤稿:我们所学到的以及可以采取哪些措施来防止未来再次发生。

Fraud and retraction in perioperative medicine publications: what we learned and what can be implemented to prevent future recurrence.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, Roma, Lazio, Italy.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, Roma, Lazio, Italy

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2022 Jul;48(7):479-484. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107252. Epub 2021 May 14.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2021-107252
PMID:33990431
Abstract

Fraud in medical publications is an increasing concern. In particular, disciplines related to perioperative medicine-including anaesthesia and critical care-currently hold the highest rankings in terms of retracted papers for research misconduct. The dominance of this dubious achievement is attributable to a limited number of researchers who have repeatedly committed scientific fraud. In the last three decades, six researchers have authored 421 of the 475 papers retracted in perioperative medicine. This narrative review reports on six cases of fabricated publication in perioperative medicine that resulted in the paper's retraction. The process that led to the unveiling of the fraud, the impact on clinical practice, and changes in regulatory mechanisms of scientific companies and governmental agencies' policies are also presented. Fraud in medical publications is a growing concern that affects perioperative medicine requiring a substantial number of papers to be retracted. The continuous control elicited by readers, by local institutional review boards, scientific journal reviewers, scientific societies and government agencies can play an important role in preserving the 'pact of trust' between authors, professionals and ultimately the relationship between doctors and patients.

摘要

医学出版物中的欺诈行为日益受到关注。特别是与围手术期医学相关的学科,包括麻醉和重症监护,目前在因研究不当而撤回的论文中排名最高。这一可疑成就的主导地位归因于少数反复从事科学欺诈的研究人员。在过去的三十年中,有六位研究人员撰写了围手术期医学中撤回的 475 篇论文中的 421 篇。本叙述性综述报告了围手术期医学中伪造出版的六个案例,这些案例导致论文被撤回。还介绍了导致欺诈行为曝光的过程、对临床实践的影响,以及科学公司和政府机构监管机制的变化。医学出版物中的欺诈行为日益受到关注,这影响了围手术期医学,需要撤回大量论文。读者、当地机构审查委员会、科学期刊审稿人、科学协会和政府机构的持续控制,可以在维护作者、专业人员,最终是医生和患者之间的“信任契约”方面发挥重要作用。

相似文献

1
Fraud and retraction in perioperative medicine publications: what we learned and what can be implemented to prevent future recurrence.围手术期医学出版物中的欺诈和撤稿:我们所学到的以及可以采取哪些措施来防止未来再次发生。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jul;48(7):479-484. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107252. Epub 2021 May 14.
2
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?科学文献中的撤稿:作者是否故意从事研究欺诈?
J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):113-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.038125. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
3
Reasons for article retraction in anesthesiology: a comprehensive analysis.麻醉学领域文章撤稿的原因:综合分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Jan;67(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01508-3. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
4
Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals.被撤稿的生物医学文献在开放获取期刊上发表。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):855-868. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0040-6. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
5
[Cases of fraud in publications: From Darsee to Poldermans].[出版物中的欺诈案例:从达西到波尔德曼斯]
Presse Med. 2012 Sep;41(9 Pt 1):816-20. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2012.04.019. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
6
Retraction of publications: a study of biomedical journals retracting publications based on impact factor and journal category.撤稿研究:基于影响因子和期刊类别对生物医学期刊撤稿情况的研究。
Gac Sanit. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):430-434. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 Sep 15.
7
Ethical and legal considerations in a case of research fraud.一起科研欺诈案件中的伦理和法律考量
J Am Coll Dent. 2008 Summer;75(2):29-35.
8
The unfortunately long life of some retracted biomedical research publications.一些被撤回的生物医学研究出版物不幸的漫长寿命。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020 May 1;128(5):1381-1391. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00003.2020. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
9
Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors.不当行为作为撤稿的主要原因。对撤稿出版物及其作者的描述性研究。
Gac Sanit. 2019 Jul-Aug;33(4):356-360. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
10
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.不当行为导致了大多数被撤回的科学出版物。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17028-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Editors' note: Comments on alleged editor misconduct in anesthesiology journals.编者按:关于麻醉学期刊中编辑不当行为的评论。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Apr;39(2):261-262. doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01281-3.
2
The Erosion of Healthcare and Scientific Integrity: A Growing Concern.医疗保健与科学诚信的侵蚀:日益令人担忧的问题。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 Feb 21;17:23-43. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S506767. eCollection 2025.
3
The importance of rigor in pharmacy research: Challenges and solutions.药学研究中严谨性的重要性:挑战与解决方案。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2025 May;21(5):424-430. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.02.005. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
4
Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora's Box Has Been Opened.人工智能可以生成虚假但看起来真实的科学医学文章:潘多拉的盒子已经被打开。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 31;25:e46924. doi: 10.2196/46924.
5
Systematic review of retracted articles in critical care medicine.重症医学领域撤稿文章的系统评价。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Apr;128(4):e292-e294. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Feb 16.