Gionfriddo Michael R, McClendon Chyna, Nolfi David A, Kalarchian Melissa A, Covvey Jordan R
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Duquesne University School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2025 May;21(5):424-430. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.02.005. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
Scientific rigor broadly refers to upholding basic principles within the conduct of research. Various threats associated with rigor exist in today's research environment, such as the replication crisis, the increasing prevalence of misconduct, and a loss of public trust in regulatory and educational institutions. The purpose of this commentary is to identify problems and solutions associated with research rigor, with a focus on pharmacy research. Problems exist at many levels, including within variable research training/funding, institutional pressures associated with career advancement, and norms associated with academic publishing. However, solutions are possible as methods of harm reduction, including (but not limited to) focused initiatives supporting rigor, team-based approaches to research that include diverse interested parties, and a reimagining of what constitutes value within science. Pharmacists and pharmacy researchers are called upon to uphold research rigor as a professional and ethical responsibility.
科学严谨性广义上是指在研究过程中坚持基本原则。在当今的研究环境中存在着与严谨性相关的各种威胁,比如复制危机、不当行为日益普遍,以及公众对监管和教育机构信任的丧失。本评论的目的是识别与研究严谨性相关的问题及解决方案,重点关注药学研究。问题存在于多个层面,包括研究培训/资金的可变性、与职业发展相关的机构压力,以及与学术出版相关的规范。然而,作为减少危害的方法,解决方案是可行的,包括(但不限于)支持严谨性的重点举措、包含不同利益相关方的团队研究方法,以及对科学领域价值构成的重新构想。药剂师和药学研究人员被要求将坚持研究严谨性作为一项专业和道德责任。