Suppr超能文献

阿达木单抗生物类似药 ABP501 和 SB5 与阿达木单抗原研药同样有效且安全。

Adalimumab biosimilars, ABP501 and SB5, are equally effective and safe as adalimumab originator.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35121, Padua, Italy.

Endoscopy Unit, Alto Vicentino Hospital, AULSS7, Pedemontana, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 May 14;11(1):10368. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89790-4.

Abstract

To date, data on effectiveness and safety of Adalimumab (ADA) biosimilars in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to verify the ability of ABP501 and SB5 to maintain the clinical and biochemical response induced by the ADA originator, after switching to them. We prospectively analyzed data collected from 55 patients with IBD who switched to ABP501, and 25 patients with IBD who switched to SB5, from ADA originator at four IBD Units between 2018 and 2020. In addition, we included an age and sex-matched control group (n = 38) who continued ADA originator for at least two years and who did not switch to a biosimilar drug. Clinical and biochemical data (C-Reactive Protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin (FC)), concomitant steroid and/or immunosuppressant therapy at the time of the switch and after six months were collected. At six months, in the ABP501 group, we did not observe statistically significant modifications in clinical activity of disease (p = 0.09) and FC values (p = 0.90) Some patients (n = 8) needed to add steroids at six months after switching (p = 0.01), however the need for optimization was not significant between the two timepoints (p = 0.70). Finally, 14.5% patients stopped therapy after six months. Similarly, in the SB5 group we observed a stability of clinical activity and FC values (p = 0.90 and p = 0.20), and a concomitant statistically significant decrease in CRP (p = 0.03). There were no differences in steroids/immunosuppressants need or optimizing biological therapy in this group. Finally, drug survival curves of patients who switched from originator to ABP501 and those who continued ADA originator were similar (p = 0.20). Overall, biosimilar drugs seem to be as effective and safe as the originator. Further larger and longer studies are mandatory to understand the clinical implications of these findings.

摘要

迄今为止,阿达木单抗(ADA)生物类似药在炎症性肠病(IBD)中的有效性和安全性数据尚缺乏。因此,我们旨在验证 ABP501 和 SB5 在切换至这些药物后维持 ADA 原研药诱导的临床和生化缓解的能力。我们前瞻性分析了 2018 年至 2020 年期间,在四个 IBD 单位中,55 例 IBD 患者和 25 例 IBD 患者从 ADA 原研药切换至 ABP501 和 SB5 的数据。此外,我们纳入了一个年龄和性别匹配的对照组(n=38),这些患者继续使用 ADA 原研药至少两年,并且没有转换为生物类似药。收集切换时和切换后六个月的临床和生化数据(C 反应蛋白(CRP),粪便钙卫蛋白(FC))、同时使用的类固醇和/或免疫抑制剂治疗。在六个月时,我们观察到 ABP501 组疾病的临床活动(p=0.09)和 FC 值(p=0.90)没有统计学上的显著变化。一些患者(n=8)在切换后六个月需要添加类固醇(p=0.01),但在两个时间点之间,对优化的需求没有显著差异(p=0.70)。最后,14.5%的患者在六个月后停止治疗。同样,在 SB5 组中,我们观察到临床活动和 FC 值的稳定性(p=0.90 和 p=0.20),同时 CRP 呈统计学显著下降(p=0.03)。在这个组中,类固醇/免疫抑制剂的需求或优化生物治疗没有差异。最后,从原研药切换至 ABP501 和继续使用 ADA 原研药的患者的药物生存曲线相似(p=0.20)。总的来说,生物类似药似乎与原研药一样有效和安全。需要进行更大和更长时间的研究,以了解这些发现的临床意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e0/8121777/933f6f8f0393/41598_2021_89790_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验