IBD Clinical and Research Centre, ISCARE a.s., Prague, Czech Republic.
First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul;57(7):814-824. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2041082. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Originator-adalimumab, an established treatment for patients with Crohn's disease (CD), showed no difference in efficacy or adverse events versus adalimumab biosimilar SB5 (SB5-adalimumab) over 10 weeks (W) of treatment. To understand the long-term effectiveness of SB5-adalimumab in CD, patients switched from originator-adalimumab to SB5-adalimumab were compared with patients remaining on originator-adalimumab over 104 W.
Data on patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with CD and treated at ISCARE, were collected prospectively from July 2018 to January 2021. Primary outcome: clinical disease activity at W52, measured by Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI). Secondary outcomes: C-reactive protein (CRP), faecal calprotectin (FC) and adalimumab concentrations at W10, 26, 52 and 104, and treatment persistence. To ensure comparable cohorts, patients were propensity score (PS)-matched for age, gender and disease activity.
After matching, 54 patients remained per cohort. At W52, mean (SD) HBI score was 3.2 (2.5) for originator-adalimumab and 4.0 [3.6] for SB5-adalimumab (difference [95% CI] -0.78 [-2.8, 1.3]; = 18/cohort); no clinically meaningful differences in CRP, FC or drug concentrations were noted. Kaplan-Meier's estimates (95% CI) of remaining on treatment were originator-adalimumab: 0.870 (0.785-0.965) versus SB5-adalimumab: 0.648 (0.533-0.789) at W52 and significantly lower for SB5-adalimumab versus originator-adalimumab ( < .001) over 104 W. Local skin reaction events/pain was the main reason for treatment discontinuation in the SB5-adalimumab cohort ( = 20/54 [37%]).
These long-term results of CD patients receiving originator-adalimumab or following nonmedical switch to SB5-adalimumab show similar therapeutic effects on clinical disease activity, biological parameters and pharmacokinetic profile in both cohorts from 52 to 104 W. A separation in persistence was observed beyond W26, mainly due to differences in local reactions at the injection site.
背景/目的:针对克罗恩病(CD)患者,原研阿达木单抗与阿达木单抗生物类似药 SB5(SB5-阿达木单抗)在治疗 10 周时,其疗效和不良事件均无差异。为了了解 SB5-阿达木单抗在 CD 中的长期疗效,比较了从原研阿达木单抗转为 SB5-阿达木单抗的患者与继续使用原研阿达木单抗的患者在 104 周时的情况。
从 2018 年 7 月至 2021 年 1 月,前瞻性地收集了在 ISCARE 接受治疗的年龄≥18 岁、被诊断为 CD 的患者的数据。主要结局:第 52 周时采用 Harvey-Bradshaw 指数(HBI)评估的临床疾病活动。次要结局:第 10、26、52 和 104 周时的 C 反应蛋白(CRP)、粪便钙卫蛋白(FC)和阿达木单抗浓度,以及治疗持续时间。为确保可比队列,采用倾向评分(PS)对年龄、性别和疾病活动度进行了匹配。
匹配后,每个队列各有 54 例患者。第 52 周时,原研阿达木单抗组的平均(SD)HBI 评分为 3.2(2.5),SB5-阿达木单抗组为 4.0[3.6](差值[95%CI]−0.78[−2.8, 1.3]; = 18/队列);CRP、FC 或药物浓度无临床意义差异。Kaplan-Meier 估计(95%CI)第 52 周时继续治疗的情况是:原研阿达木单抗组为 0.870(0.785-0.965),SB5-阿达木单抗组为 0.648(0.533-0.789),SB5-阿达木单抗组显著低于原研阿达木单抗组( < 0.001),并且在 104 周时仍然如此。SB5-阿达木单抗组主要因局部皮肤反应/疼痛而停药( = 20/54[37%])。
接受原研阿达木单抗治疗或非医学原因转为 SB5-阿达木单抗的 CD 患者的这些长期结果显示,在第 52 至 104 周时,两组患者的临床疾病活动、生物学参数和药代动力学特征均有相似的治疗效果。在第 26 周后,两组的治疗持续率出现了差异,主要是由于注射部位的局部反应不同。