文献检索，用中文搜 PubMed

1

Inferior alveolar nerve block: is articaine better than lidocaine?下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉：阿替卡因优于利多卡因吗？

Br Dent J. 2021 May;230(9):579-582. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-2941-z. Epub 2021 May 14.

2

A comparison of articaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks.阿替卡因与利多卡因在下牙槽神经阻滞中的比较。

J Endod. 2005 Apr;31(4):265-70. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000140576.36513.cb.

3

Does articaine, rather than lidocaine, increase the risk of nerve damage when administered for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients undergoing local anaesthesia for dental treatment? A mini systematic review of the literature.在局部麻醉下进行牙科治疗的患者中，相较于利多卡因，使用阿替卡因行下牙槽神经阻滞是否会增加神经损伤的风险？文献的小型系统性回顾。

Br Dent J. 2019 Feb 8;226(3):213-223. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.98.

4

An in vivo, randomized, controlled comparative evaluation of efficacy, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications of 4% articaine using buccal infiltration and 2% lidocaine using inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular primary molars of children aged 6 to 8 years.一项体内、随机、对照的疗效、血流动力学变化和术后并发症评估，比较了 4%阿替卡因颊侧浸润和 2%利多卡因下颌神经阻滞在 6 至 8 岁儿童下颌乳磨牙中的应用。

Quintessence Int. 2021 Sep 9;52(9):780-786. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b1492247.

5

Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block.在下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉后，比较阿替卡因与利多卡因作为下颌第一磨牙颊侧补充浸润麻醉的麻醉效果。

J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139(9):1228-35. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0338.

6

Efficacy of Articaine Versus Lidocaine Administered as Supplementary Intraligamentary Injection after a Failed Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Randomized Double-blind Study.阿替卡因与利多卡因作为下牙槽神经阻滞失败后的补充内淋巴管注射的疗效：一项随机双盲研究。

J Endod. 2019 Jan;45(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

7

Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Supplemental Infiltration for Mandibular First versus Second Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.阿替卡因对比利多卡因在下颌第一、二磨牙牙髓不可逆性炎症中辅助浸润麻醉的疗效：一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验。

J Endod. 2018 Apr;44(4):523-528. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.003. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

8

BUCCAL INFILTRATION WITH 4% ARTICAINE MAY BE AN ALTERNATIVE OPTION TO INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE BLOCK WITH 2% LIDOCAINE FOR PULP THERAPY IN PRIMARY MANDIBULAR MOLARS.颊侧浸润麻醉 4%阿替卡因可替代下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉 2%利多卡因用于下颌第一磨牙牙髓治疗。

J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022 Dec;22(4):101801. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101801. Epub 2022 Oct 22.

9

Comparison of the efficacy of a standard inferior alveolar nerve block versus articaine infiltration for invasive dental treatment in permanent mandibular molars in children: a pilot study.儿童恒牙下颌磨牙侵入性牙科治疗中标准下牙槽神经阻滞与阿替卡因浸润疗效的比较：一项初步研究。

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Feb;21(1):171-177. doi: 10.1007/s40368-019-00496-8. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

10

Articaine Infiltration Versus Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Anesthetizing Primary Mandibular Molars: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study.阿替卡因浸润麻醉与利多卡因下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉用于下颌第一磨牙麻醉的随机对照双盲试验研究

Pediatr Dent. 2021 Sep 15;43(5):344-348.

Suppr 超能文献

文献检索

文件翻译

深度研究

Suppr 超能文献

下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉：阿替卡因优于利多卡因吗？

Inferior alveolar nerve block: is articaine better than lidocaine?

机构信息

出版信息

这篇观点文章旨在分析目前关于以下问题的文献