Department of Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health-Core, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diabet Med. 2021 Sep;38(9):e14600. doi: 10.1111/dme.14600. Epub 2021 May 24.
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) allocating type 2 diabetes patients to treatment with sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors or placebo have found significant effects on the risk of heart failure and modest effects on mortality. In the wake of the first trials, a number of observational studies have been conducted, some of these reporting a mortality reduction of 50% compared to active comparators. In this review, we systematically assess and compare the results on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization observed in RCTs with the results obtained in observational studies.
We performed a systematic bibliographical search including cardiovascular outcome trials and observational studies assessing the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on mortality and heart failure.
Seven RCTs and 23 observational studies were included in the current review. The observed heterogeneity between study results for all-cause mortality (p-interaction < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (p-interaction < 0.001) was explained by study type, whereas this was not the case for heart failure (p-interaction = 0.18).
Methodological considerations such as the omission of important confounders, immortal-time bias and residual confounding such as unmeasured social economic inequality may be the cause of the inflated results observed in observational studies and that calls for caution when observational studies are used to guide treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.
随机临床试验(RCT)将 2 型糖尿病患者分配到钠-葡萄糖转运蛋白 2(SGLT-2)抑制剂或安慰剂治疗组,发现对心力衰竭风险有显著影响,对死亡率有适度影响。在第一批试验之后,进行了一些观察性研究,其中一些研究报告与活性对照相比,死亡率降低了 50%。在本综述中,我们系统地评估和比较了 RCT 中观察到的全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和心力衰竭住院率的结果与观察性研究中获得的结果。
我们进行了系统的文献检索,包括评估 SGLT-2 抑制剂对死亡率和心力衰竭影响的心血管结局试验和观察性研究。
本综述纳入了 7 项 RCT 和 23 项观察性研究。全因死亡率(p 交互 < 0.001)和心血管死亡率(p 交互 < 0.001)的研究结果之间存在观察到的异质性,这可以用研究类型来解释,而心力衰竭则不然(p 交互 = 0.18)。
方法学方面的考虑因素,如重要混杂因素的遗漏、无事件时间偏倚和未测量的社会经济不平等的残余混杂,可能是观察性研究中观察到的结果膨胀的原因,因此在使用观察性研究来指导 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗时需要谨慎。