Suppr超能文献

新型创新一次性抓钳联合软性膀胱镜取输尿管支架的疗效:系统评价。

Efficacy of the novel, innovative, single-use grasper integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal: a systematic review.

机构信息

The Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Wits Medical School, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Departments of Urology, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH), Helen Joseph Hospital (HJH), and Rahima Moosa Mother & Child Hospital (RMMCh), Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2021 Dec;91(12):2599-2605. doi: 10.1111/ans.16962. Epub 2021 May 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to define the published impact, efficacy, cost-effectiveness and precise role of the Isiris-α device: the world's first sterile, single-use grasper integrated flexible cystoscope (SUGIFC) for ureteral stent removal.

METHODS

After PROSPERO registration (CRD42021228755), the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized. The search terms "Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope," and "Isiris," within the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and EMBASE were searched.

RESULTS

In this review, a cumulative total experience (10 publications) included 970 "SUGIFC" procedures (755 patients). However, only 366/970 procedures were actually used for "ureteral stent removal," with the remainder being surveillance cystoscopy only (603/970) or foreign body retrieval (1/970). Procedure-related and device failures in planned "removal of ureteral stents," was reported in 8/366 (346 patients) and 1/366 (346 patients), respectively. The cost-benefit utilizing the SUGIFC device is advantageous compared to "in-theatre" stent removals and favours less busy centres where maintenance, repair and replacement costs are more relevant. Other listed benefits include shorter stent indwelling times, shorter procedure duration, lower rates of bacteriuria and urinary tract infections, fewer emergency department visits and lower readmission rates. Technical limitations include the absence of an independent working channel, a narrower visual field and the lack of image universality since the monitor is device-specific.

CONCLUSION

The SUGIFC device needs to be outweighed against local costs and individual health systems. Its application in ambulatory ureteral stent removal may become significant due to the accessibility and convenience that it offers the attending urologist.

摘要

背景

我们旨在定义 Isiris-α 设备的已发表影响、疗效、成本效益和确切作用:这是世界上第一个无菌、一次性的抓握式灵活膀胱镜(SUGIFC),用于输尿管支架取出。

方法

在 PROSPERO 注册(CRD42021228755)后,使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。在以下数据库中搜索“抓握式灵活膀胱镜”和“Isiris”的搜索词:PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 EMBASE。

结果

在本综述中,累积总经验(10 项出版物)包括 970 例“ SUGIFC”手术(755 例患者)。然而,实际上只有 366/970 例手术用于“输尿管支架取出”,其余均为仅进行监视性膀胱镜检查(603/970)或异物取出(1/970)。在计划的“输尿管支架取出”中,与手术相关的和与设备相关的失败分别报告为 8/366(346 例患者)和 1/366(346 例患者)。与“在手术室”进行支架取出相比,使用 SUGIFC 设备的成本效益更具优势,并且更有利于维护、维修和更换成本更为相关的不那么繁忙的中心。其他列出的益处包括留置支架时间更短、手术时间更短、菌尿和尿路感染发生率更低、急诊就诊次数更少和再入院率更低。技术局限性包括缺乏独立工作通道、视野更窄以及由于监视器是特定于设备的,因此缺乏图像通用性。

结论

SUGIFC 设备需要与当地成本和个别卫生系统进行权衡。由于为主治泌尿科医生提供了可及性和便利性,因此它在门诊输尿管支架取出中的应用可能变得非常重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验