Ahmad Hira, Halleran Devin R, Stanek Joseph R, Thompson Benjamin P, Bates D Gregory, Rusin Jerome A, Minneci Peter C, Levitt Marc A, Wood Richard J
Department of Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstruction Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, FOB 6B, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.
Biostatistics Resource at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Sep;51(10):1867-1872. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05094-9. Epub 2021 May 15.
The sacral ratio has been used as a tool for evaluating sacral development in patients with anorectal malformations. Sacral ratios can be calculated by obtaining sacral radiographs in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral planes.
The objective of the study was to determine the correlation and agreement in sacral ratio calculations.
In this single institution retrospective cohort study, we reviewed medical charts of all pediatric anorectal malformation patients treated between March 2014 and September 2018 who had both AP and lateral images of their sacrum. All sacral ratios were measured by three radiologists. Pearson's correlation coefficients and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the correlation between the AP and lateral radiographs. A weighted Kappa statistic was used to measure the agreement between how the AP and lateral sacral ratios categorized observations into risk groups.
Our initial cohort consisted of 646 observations from patients with anorectal malformations who had radiographs obtained in both AP and lateral planes. We excluded all observations (n=76) where the radiographs were deemed to be inadequate or not appropriately centered to measure sacral ratio. For a given pair of measurements, the mean lateral sacral ratio was 0.07 units greater than the AP plane (95% CI 0.06-0.09, paired t-test P-value <0.0001). AP and lateral images had a moderate positive correlation (Pearson's r=0.76, 95% CI 0.73-0.79, P<0.0001) and moderate agreement in risk categorization (unweighted kappa = 0.60, P<0.0001). AP and lateral readings conducted by all three radiologists had excellent inter-rater reliability with intraclass correlations for AP and lateral sacral ratios of 0.88 and 0.84, respectively.
Even though the AP and lateral sacral ratios had moderate positive correlation, the mean sacral ratio determined by images in the lateral plane was 0.07 units greater than the AP plane. AP and lateral sacral ratios concluded different risk categories relatively often. Future studies are needed to determine whether AP or lateral sacral ratios correlate better with continence in patients with anorectal malformations.
骶骨比例已被用作评估肛门直肠畸形患者骶骨发育的一种工具。骶骨比例可通过获取前后位(AP)和侧位平面的骶骨X线片来计算。
本研究的目的是确定骶骨比例计算中的相关性和一致性。
在这项单机构回顾性队列研究中,我们回顾了2014年3月至2018年9月期间接受治疗的所有小儿肛门直肠畸形患者的病历,这些患者均有骶骨的前后位和侧位影像。所有骶骨比例均由三位放射科医生测量。采用Pearson相关系数及相应的95%置信区间(CIs)来评估前后位和侧位X线片之间的相关性。采用加权Kappa统计量来衡量前后位和侧位骶骨比例将观察结果分类到风险组的一致性。
我们最初的队列包括646例肛门直肠畸形患者的观察结果,这些患者均有前后位和侧位平面的X线片。我们排除了所有X线片被认为不充分或未适当居中以测量骶骨比例的观察结果(n = 76)。对于给定的一对测量值,侧位骶骨比例的平均值比前后位平面大0.07个单位(95% CI 0.06 - 0.09,配对t检验P值<0.0001)。前后位和侧位影像具有中度正相关(Pearson's r = 0.76,95% CI 0.73 - 0.79,P < 0.0001),并且在风险分类方面具有中度一致性(未加权kappa = 0.60,P < 0.0001)。三位放射科医生进行的前后位和侧位读数具有出色的评分者间信度,前后位和侧位骶骨比例的组内相关性分别为0.88和0.84。
尽管前后位和侧位骶骨比例具有中度正相关,但侧位平面影像确定的骶骨比例平均值比前后位平面大0.07个单位。前后位和侧位骶骨比例相对频繁地得出不同的风险类别。未来需要进行研究以确定前后位或侧位骶骨比例与肛门直肠畸形患者的控便能力是否具有更好的相关性。