Lal Rohit, Hasan Zaheer, Rahul Sandip Kumar, Thakur Vinit Kumar, Verma Tanu
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Department of Paediatric Surgery, AIIMS, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2025 Jul-Aug;30(4):513-518. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_28_25. Epub 2025 May 21.
Sacral ratio (SR) is currently the only measurement to quantitatively evaluate sacral development in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs). This study proposes sacral curvature (SC) and sacral index (SI) as a new indicator to qualitatively assess the sacrum and hypothesizes that sacral development, both quantitatively and qualitatively, can be an indicator to predict the type of ARM. The study aims to investigate the difference of SI, SR, and SC between ARM types and the association with the type of ARM.
This study was prospectively conducted for 18 months. Male patients with ARMs were enrolled and divided into three groups based on the types of ARM: (1) low ARM, (2) intermediate ARM, and (3) high ARM. SI was measured using anterioposterior radiograph (infantogram). SC was measured using lateral radiograph of the sacrum (prone cross-table lateral radiographs).
Sixty-three male patients with ARMs were included in the study. SIs were 93.766 ± 8.2309, 99.878 ± 5.832, and 109.481 ± 7.4646 in low, intermediate, and high ARM, respectively ( < 0.0001). The SRs in low and intermediate ARM were significantly higher than that in high ARM (0.728 ± 0.05796, 0.625 ± 0.06577, and 0.547 ± 0.6702, < 0.0001). SCs were 0.232 ± 0.02663, 0.211 ± 0.01621, and 0.1790 ± 0.02364 in low, intermediate, and high ARM, respectively ( < 0.0001).
The higher the rectal level is in an ARM, the lower are the objective measurements of the sacrum. SR was the most common and established parameter to assess the sacral development and its correlation with the level of ARM. However, this study demonstrated that in addition to SR, SC and SI can be a possible predictor for the assessment of the level of ARM.
骶骨比率(SR)是目前唯一用于定量评估肛门直肠畸形(ARM)患者骶骨发育情况的指标。本研究提出将骶骨曲率(SC)和骶骨指数(SI)作为定性评估骶骨的新指标,并假设骶骨的定量和定性发育均可作为预测ARM类型的指标。本研究旨在调查不同类型ARM之间SI、SR和SC的差异以及与ARM类型的关联。
本研究前瞻性进行了18个月。纳入患有ARM的男性患者,并根据ARM类型分为三组:(1)低位ARM,(2)中位ARM,(3)高位ARM。使用前后位X线片(婴儿骨盆片)测量SI。使用骶骨侧位X线片(俯卧位交叉台面侧位片)测量SC。
本研究纳入了63例患有ARM的男性患者。低位、中位和高位ARM的SI分别为93.766±8.2309、99.878±5.832和109.481±7.4646(<0.0001)。低位和中位ARM的SR显著高于高位ARM(0.728±0.05796、0.625±0.06577和0.547±0.6702,<0.0001)。低位、中位和高位ARM的SC分别为0.232±0.02663、0.211±0.01621和0.1790±0.02364(<0.0001)。
ARM中直肠位置越高,骶骨的客观测量值越低。SR是评估骶骨发育及其与ARM水平相关性的最常用且已确立的参数。然而,本研究表明,除SR外,SC和SI也可能是评估ARM水平的预测指标。