Department of Population Health Science and Policy and Department of Genetics and Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Allergy. 2021 Dec;76(12):3789-3797. doi: 10.1111/all.14905. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
Accurate diagnosis of peanut allergy is a significant clinical challenge. Here, a novel diagnostic blood test using the peanut bead-based epitope assay ("peanut BBEA") was developed utilizing the LEAP cohort and then validated using two independent cohorts.
The development of the peanut BBEA diagnostic test followed the National Academy of Medicine's established guidelines with discovery performed on 133 subjects from the non-interventional arm of the LEAP trial and an independent validation performed on 82 subjects from the CoFAR2 and 84 subjects from the POISED study. All samples were analyzed using the peanut BBEA methodology, which measures levels of IgE to two Ara h 2 sequential (linear) epitopes and compares their combination to a threshold pre-specified in the model development phase. When a patient has an inconclusive outcome by skin prick testing (or sIgE), IgE antibody levels to this combination of two epitopes can distinguish whether the patient is "Allergic" or "Not Allergic." Diagnoses of peanut allergy in all subjects were confirmed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge and subjects' ages were 7-55 years.
In the validation using CoFAR2 and POISED cohorts, the peanut BBEA diagnostic test correctly diagnosed 93% of the subjects, with a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 94%, a positive predictive value of 91%, and negative predictive value of 95%.
In validation of the peanut BBEA diagnostic test, the overall accuracy was found to be superior to existing diagnostic tests for peanut allergy including skin prick testing, peanut sIgE, and peanut component sIgE testing.
准确诊断花生过敏是一项重大的临床挑战。在这里,我们利用 LEAP 队列开发了一种使用花生珠基表位检测(“花生 BBEA”)的新型诊断性血液检测方法,然后使用两个独立的队列进行了验证。
花生 BBEA 诊断测试的开发遵循了国家科学院制定的指导方针,在 LEAP 试验的非干预性手臂中对 133 名受试者进行了发现,在 CoFAR2 和 POISED 研究中对 82 名和 84 名受试者进行了独立验证。所有样本均使用花生 BBEA 方法进行分析,该方法测量对两个 Ara h 2 连续(线性)表位的 IgE 水平,并将其组合与模型开发阶段中预先指定的阈值进行比较。当患者的皮肤点刺试验(或 sIgE)结果不确定时,对这两个表位组合的 IgE 抗体水平可以区分患者是“过敏”还是“不过敏”。所有受试者的花生过敏诊断均通过双盲安慰剂对照食物挑战确认,受试者年龄为 7-55 岁。
在使用 CoFAR2 和 POISED 队列进行的验证中,花生 BBEA 诊断测试正确诊断了 93%的受试者,其灵敏度为 92%,特异性为 94%,阳性预测值为 91%,阴性预测值为 95%。
在对花生 BBEA 诊断测试的验证中,发现总体准确性优于现有的花生过敏诊断测试,包括皮肤点刺试验、花生 sIgE 和花生成分 sIgE 检测。