The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Department of Cardiology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Sep 1;6(9):1032-1041. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.1720.
IMPORTANCE: Shortened dual antiplatelet therapy followed by potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy reduces bleeding without increasing ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVE: To explore sex differences and evaluate the association of sex with outcomes among patients treated with ticagrelor monotherapy vs ticagrelor plus aspirin. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of TWILIGHT, an investigator-initiated, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted at 187 sites across 11 countries. Study participants included patients who underwent successful PCI with drug-eluting stents, were planned for discharge with ticagrelor plus aspirin, and who had at least 1 clinical and at least 1 angiographic feature associated with high risk of ischemic or bleeding events. Data were analyzed from May to July 2020. INTERVENTIONS: At 3 months after PCI, patients adherent to ticagrelor and aspirin without major adverse event were randomized to either aspirin or placebo for an additional 12 months along with ticagrelor. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding at 12 months after randomization. The primary ischemic end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. RESULTS: Of 9006 enrolled patients, 7119 underwent randomization (mean [SD] age, 63.9 [10.2] years; 5421 [76.1%] men). Women were older (mean [SD] age, 65.5 [9.6] years in women vs 63.4 [10.3] years in men) with higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (347 women [21.2%] vs 764 men [14.7%]). The primary bleeding end point occurred more often in women than men (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.64; P = .01). After multivariate adjustment, incremental bleeding risk associated with female sex was no longer significant (adjusted HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.95-1.52; P = .12). Ischemic end points were similar between sexes. Ticagrelor plus placebo vs ticagrelor plus aspirin was associated with lower risk of BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding in women (adjusted HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.92; P = .02) and men (adjusted HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44-0.73; P < .001; P for interaction = .69). Ischemic end points were similar between treatment groups in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that the higher bleeding risk in women compared with men was mostly attributable to baseline differences, whereas ischemic events were similar between sexes. In this high-risk PCI population, the benefits of early aspirin withdrawal with continuation of ticagrelor were generally comparable in women and men. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02270242.
重要性:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,缩短双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)后转为强效 P2Y12 受体抑制剂单药治疗可减少出血,而不会增加缺血事件。 目的:探讨性别差异,并评估在接受替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛加阿司匹林治疗的患者中,性别与结局的相关性。 设计、地点和参与者:这是一项由研究者发起的、安慰剂对照的随机临床试验 TWILIGHT 的预先指定的二次分析,该试验在 11 个国家的 187 个地点进行。研究参与者包括成功接受药物洗脱支架 PCI 的患者,计划出院时给予替格瑞洛加阿司匹林治疗,且至少有 1 项临床特征和至少 1 项与缺血或出血事件高风险相关的血管造影特征。数据于 2020 年 5 月至 7 月进行分析。 干预措施:在 PCI 后 3 个月,服用替格瑞洛和阿司匹林且无主要不良事件的患者,按照随机分组,继续服用替格瑞洛加阿司匹林或替格瑞洛加安慰剂治疗 12 个月。 主要终点:随机分组后 12 个月的出血学术研究联合会(BARC)类型 2、3 或 5 级出血。主要缺血终点为死亡、心肌梗死或卒中的复合终点。 结果:在 9006 名入组患者中,有 7119 名患者进行了随机分组(平均[标准差]年龄为 63.9[10.2]岁;5421[76.1%]名男性)。女性年龄更大(平均[标准差]年龄为 65.5[9.6]岁,女性 vs 63.4[10.3]岁,男性),且慢性肾脏病患病率更高(347 名女性[21.2%] vs 764 名男性[14.7%])。女性的主要出血终点发生率高于男性(风险比[HR],1.32;95%置信区间[CI],1.06-1.64;P = .01)。在多变量调整后,女性性别与出血风险增加之间的关联不再显著(调整后 HR,1.20;95% CI,0.95-1.52;P = .12)。各性别间的缺血终点相似。替格瑞洛加安慰剂与替格瑞洛加阿司匹林相比,女性(调整后 HR,0.62;95% CI,0.42-0.92;P = .02)和男性(调整后 HR,0.57;95% CI,0.44-0.73;P < .001;P 交互 = .69)的 BARC 类型 2、3 或 5 级出血风险较低。各性别间的缺血终点相似。 结论和相关性:这些发现表明,与男性相比,女性的出血风险较高主要归因于基线差异,而缺血事件在两性之间相似。在这一高危 PCI 人群中,早期停用阿司匹林并继续使用替格瑞洛,其获益在女性和男性中通常相当。 试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02270242。
N Engl J Med. 2019-9-26
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020-3-30
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022-2-14
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024-10-20
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022-10-17
Am Heart J Plus. 2024-6-25