Suppr超能文献

替格瑞洛联合或不联合阿司匹林用于复杂 PCI 后。

Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin After Complex PCI.

机构信息

The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 19;75(19):2414-2424. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Mar 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether a regimen of ticagrelor monotherapy attenuates bleeding complications without increasing ischemic risk in patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients undergoing complex PCI from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor with Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial.

METHODS

In the TWILIGHT trial, after 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, event-free and adherent patients remained on ticagrelor and were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or placebo for 1 year. Complex PCI was defined as any of the following: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 lesions treated, total stent length >60 mm, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, atherectomy device use, left main PCI, surgical bypass graft or chronic total occlusion as target lesions. Bleeding and ischemic endpoints were evaluated at 1 year after randomization.

RESULTS

Among 7,119 patients randomized in the main trial, complex PCI was performed in 2,342 patients. Compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin, ticagrelor plus placebo resulted in significantly lower rates of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (4.2% vs. 7.7%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38 to 0.76). BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding was also significantly reduced (1.1% vs. 2.6%; HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.80). There were no significant between-group differences in death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (3.8% vs. 4.9%; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.15), nor in stent thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing complex PCI who initially completed 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, continuation of ticagrelor monotherapy was associated with lower incidence of bleeding without increasing the risk of ischemic events compared to continuing ticagrelor plus aspirin. (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention [TWILIGHT]; NCT02270242).

摘要

背景

替格瑞洛单药治疗是否能减少复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的出血并发症而不增加缺血风险尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在评估替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛加阿司匹林在随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 TWILIGHT(高危患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后替格瑞洛加阿司匹林或单独应用)试验中接受复杂 PCI 的患者中的疗效。

方法

在 TWILIGHT 试验中,替格瑞洛加阿司匹林治疗 3 个月后,无事件且依从性好的患者继续服用替格瑞洛,并随机分为阿司匹林组或安慰剂组,接受 1 年治疗。复杂 PCI 的定义为以下任何一种情况:3 支血管病变、≥3 处病变、总支架长度>60mm、分叉病变植入 2 个支架、使用旋磨术装置、左主干 PCI、旁路移植术或慢性完全闭塞作为靶病变。随机分组 1 年后评估出血和缺血终点事件。

结果

在主要试验中,7119 例随机患者中,有 2342 例患者进行了复杂 PCI。与替格瑞洛加阿司匹林相比,替格瑞洛加安慰剂治疗的患者发生出血学术研究联合会(BARC)类型 2、3 或 5 出血的发生率显著降低(4.2%比 7.7%;风险比[HR]:0.54;95%置信区间[CI]:0.38 至 0.76)。BARC 类型 3 或 5 出血也显著减少(1.1%比 2.6%;HR:0.41;95%CI:0.21 至 0.80)。两组间死亡率、心肌梗死或卒中等缺血事件(3.8%比 4.9%;HR:0.77;95%CI:0.52 至 1.15)或支架血栓形成发生率无显著差异。

结论

在最初完成 3 个月替格瑞洛加阿司匹林治疗的复杂 PCI 患者中,与继续替格瑞洛加阿司匹林治疗相比,继续替格瑞洛单药治疗与出血发生率降低相关,而不增加缺血事件风险。(高危患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后替格瑞洛加阿司匹林或单独应用 [TWILIGHT];NCT02270242)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验