• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

突破界限:替格瑞洛单药治疗高危患者

Breaking boundaries: Ticagrelor monotherapy in high-risk patients.

作者信息

Singh Balbir, Prabhakar D, Shah Jay, R Keshava, Sinha Nakul, Kerkar Prafulla, Kumar Sahoo Prasant, Kumar Premchand Jain Rajendra, Chandra Subhash, Ray Shuvanan, Sarda Shital

机构信息

Max Healthcare, 1, 2, Press Enclave Marg, Saket Institutional Area, Hauz Rani, Saket, New Delhi, Delhi 110017, India.

Ashwin Clinic, A G Block Old No 25 New 53, Shanthi Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600040, India.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Oct 20;55:101526. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101526. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101526
PMID:39502338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11535354/
Abstract

Atherosclerotic plaque formation is a leading cause of arterial thrombosis that significantly impacts global health by instigating major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) like myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Platelets are central to this process, leading to the development of antiplatelet therapies, to mitigate MACE risks. The combination of aspirin with a potent P2Y inhibitor known as dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the standard for post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) aimed at reducing ischemic events. However, DAPT's associated bleeding risks, particularly in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients, require a balanced approach to optimize therapeutic outcomes. Recent advancements have led to the exploration of ticagrelor monotherapy as a promising strategy after short-term DAPT to reduce bleeding risks while preserving ischemic protection. This review manuscript focuses on ticagrelor monotherapy for HBR patients with discussion on optimal timing, patient selection, and treatment duration. It highlights ticagrelor's broad efficacy in diverse patient sub-groups and outlines its superiority over aspirin (ASA) and clopidogrel monotherapies. Trials such as TICO, TWILIGHT, GLOBAL LEADERS, and ULTIMATE-DAPT as well as literature -analyses validate ticagrelor monotherapy's role in lowering mortality and clinical adverse events versus conventional DAPT. The review endorses a personalized treatment regimen, beginning with DAPT before moving to ticagrelor monotherapy, as a balanced method for managing both bleeding and ischemic risks in post-PCI acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, especially those facing higher bleeding threats.

摘要

动脉粥样硬化斑块形成是动脉血栓形成的主要原因,通过引发心肌梗死(MI)和中风等主要不良心血管事件(MACE),对全球健康产生重大影响。血小板在这一过程中起着核心作用,促使了抗血小板治疗的发展,以降低MACE风险。阿司匹林与一种强效P2Y抑制剂联合使用的双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后旨在减少缺血事件的标准治疗方法。然而,DAPT相关的出血风险,尤其是在高出血风险(HBR)患者中,需要采取平衡的方法来优化治疗效果。最近的进展促使人们探索替格瑞洛单药治疗,作为短期DAPT后一种有前景的策略,以降低出血风险同时保留缺血保护作用。这篇综述文章聚焦于HBR患者的替格瑞洛单药治疗,讨论了最佳时机、患者选择和治疗持续时间。它强调了替格瑞洛在不同患者亚组中的广泛疗效,并概述了其优于阿司匹林(ASA)和氯吡格雷单药治疗的优势。TICO、TWILIGHT、GLOBAL LEADERS和ULTIMATE-DAPT等试验以及文献分析证实了替格瑞洛单药治疗相对于传统DAPT在降低死亡率和临床不良事件方面的作用。该综述支持一种个性化治疗方案,即在PCI后急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者,尤其是那些面临较高出血威胁的患者中,先采用DAPT,然后过渡到替格瑞洛单药治疗,作为平衡管理出血和缺血风险的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/11535354/de5d337e3943/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/11535354/de5d337e3943/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/11535354/de5d337e3943/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Breaking boundaries: Ticagrelor monotherapy in high-risk patients.突破界限:替格瑞洛单药治疗高危患者
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Oct 20;55:101526. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101526. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Preferred monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.短期双联抗血小板治疗后优选单药治疗:随机试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Cardiol. 2024 May;83(5):338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
3
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
4
De-escalation to ticagrelor monotherapy versus 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with and without acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials.在有和没有急性冠脉综合征的患者中,从双联抗血小板治疗降级为替格瑞洛单药治疗与继续双联抗血小板治疗 12 个月:一项随机试验的系统评价和个体患者水平荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 7;404(10456):937-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01616-7. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
5
Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷单药治疗与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗:系统评价和患者水平荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 May 1;9(5):437-448. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0133.
6
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗与传统双联抗血小板治疗的Meta分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;16(2):232. doi: 10.3390/ph16020232.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.替格瑞洛单药治疗行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Aug;110(2):424-431. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2226. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
8
Randomized evaluation of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with new-generation sirolimus-eluting stents: TICO trial rationale and design.替卡格雷单药治疗在新一代西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗急性冠脉综合征患者 3 个月双联抗血小板治疗后的随机评估:TICO 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jun;212:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of TWILIGHT and TICO Randomized Trials.替格瑞洛单药治疗行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的安全性和疗效:TWILIGHT 和 TICO 随机试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):574-584. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067283. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Ticagrelor alone versus ticagrelor plus aspirin from month 1 to month 12 after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ULTIMATE-DAPT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.替格瑞洛单用或替格瑞洛加阿司匹林用于急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 1 至 12 个月(ULTIMATE-DAPT):一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验。
Lancet. 2024 May 11;403(10439):1866-1878. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00473-2. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
2
Stopping Aspirin Within 1 Month After Stenting for Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: The T-PASS Randomized Noninferiority Trial.支架置入后 1 个月内停用阿司匹林行替格瑞洛单药治疗急性冠状动脉综合征:T-PASS 随机非劣效性试验。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):562-573. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066943. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
3
Comparison of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome at High Bleeding or Ischemic Risk.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在高出血或缺血风险急性冠脉综合征患者中的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Jan 1;210:241-248. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.10.046. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
4
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
5
Bleeding and Ischemic Risks of Ticagrelor Monotherapy After Coronary Interventions.替格瑞洛单药治疗冠脉介入术后出血及缺血风险。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Aug 22;82(8):687-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.062.
6
De-escalation or abbreviation of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Consensus Statement from an international expert panel on coronary thrombosis.急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中双联抗血小板治疗的降级或缩短:来自冠状动脉血栓形成国际专家小组的共识声明。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Dec;20(12):830-844. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00901-2. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
7
A Comparative Study on Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的比较研究
J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jul;63(7):776-783. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2239. Epub 2023 May 8.
8
Bleeding and Ischemic Outcomes With Ticagrelor Monotherapy According to Body Mass Index.根据体重指数使用替格瑞洛单药治疗的出血和缺血性结局
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct 10;15(19):1948-1960. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.07.039.
9
De-escalation of antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes: Why, how and when?急性冠状动脉综合征中抗血小板治疗的降阶梯:为何、如何以及何时?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 25;9:975969. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.975969. eCollection 2022.
10
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的抗血小板治疗。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Apr 1;17(17):e1371-e1396. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904.