Suppr超能文献

肌肉骨骼疾病的干针疗法策略:针刺数量和留针时间重要吗?一项叙述性文献综述。

Dry needling strategies for musculoskeletal conditions: Do the number of needles and needle retention time matter? A narrative literature review.

作者信息

Butts Raymond, Dunning James, Serafino Clint

机构信息

Physical Therapist, Research Physical Therapy Specialists, Columbia, SC, USA; Coordinator, American Academy of Manipulative Therapy Fellowship in Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy, USA.

Physical Therapist, Montgomery Osteopractic Physiotherapy & Acupuncture Clinic, Montgomery, AL, USA; Director, American Academy of Manipulative Therapy Fellowship in Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy, USA.

出版信息

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Apr;26:353-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

Abstract

Acupuncture and dry needling are both minimally invasive procedures that use thin, filiform needles without injectate for the management of a variety of neuromusculoskeletal pain conditions. While the theoretical constructs underlying the use of acupuncture and dry needling are unique, both appear to have the ability to elicit biochemical, biomechanical, endocrinological and neurovascular changes associated with reductions in pain and disability. However, optimal treatment dosage has yet to be determined, and there is a lack of consistency in the literature on the number of needles that should be inserted and the needle retention time. Therefore, the purpose of this narrative review is to further explore the importance of these two variables. While trigger point dry needling advocates single needle insertions via repetitive, quick in-and-out pistoning, most acupuncture and dry needling clinical trials have incorporated multiple needles for five to 40 min. Notably and to date, using a single needle to repeatedly prick trigger points one at a time with fast-in and fast-out pistoning maneuvers has not yet been shown to produce significant and clinically meaningful long term improvements in pain and disability in a wide array of musculoskeletal conditions. Insertion of multiple needles for typically 20-30 min durations has been shown to produce larger treatment effect sizes and longer-lasting outcomes than brief, single-needle strategies. Moreover, the number of needles and needle retention time are two variables associated with treatment dosage and must be carefully matched with specific musculoskeletal conditions and the patient's goals.

摘要

针灸和干针疗法都是微创手术,使用细的毫针且不注射药物来治疗各种神经肌肉骨骼疼痛病症。虽然针灸和干针疗法的理论基础各不相同,但两者似乎都有能力引发与疼痛减轻和功能障碍缓解相关的生化、生物力学、内分泌和神经血管变化。然而,最佳治疗剂量尚未确定,并且关于应插入的针数和留针时间的文献缺乏一致性。因此,本叙述性综述的目的是进一步探讨这两个变量的重要性。虽然触发点干针疗法主张通过重复、快速的进出活塞式动作单针插入,但大多数针灸和干针疗法临床试验都采用多针治疗5至40分钟。值得注意的是,迄今为止,尚未证明使用单针一次一个地反复针刺触发点并进行快速进出活塞式动作,能在广泛的肌肉骨骼病症中产生显著且具有临床意义的长期疼痛减轻和功能障碍缓解效果。已证明,与短暂的单针策略相比,插入多针并持续20 - 30分钟通常能产生更大的治疗效应量和更持久的效果。此外,针数和留针时间是与治疗剂量相关的两个变量,必须与特定的肌肉骨骼病症和患者的目标仔细匹配。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验