Akodu A K, Nwanne C A, Fapojuwo O A
Department of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Nigeria.
Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Apr;26:411-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
Neck pain poses a huge medical challenge in terms of pain and disability on patient. Therapeutic exercise has been reported to be an effective intervention for the treatment of patients with chronic neck pain.
This study therefore determined the effects of neck stabilization and Pilates exercises on pain, sleep disturbance, neck disability and kinesiophobia in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain.
Forty five patients with non-specific chronic neck pain (NSCNP) participated in this study. They were randomly assigned into 3 different groups; Neck stabilization exercise, Pilates exercise and Neck dynamic isometric exercise using computer generated number. Pain intensity, sleep disturbance, neck disability, kinesiophobia were assessed using numerical pain rating scale, insomnia severity index, neck disability index, tampas scale of kinesiophobia respectively at baseline, 4th week (mid-intervention) and 8th week (post intervention). Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics at alpha level of less than or equal to 0.05.
Findings from this study revealed an improvement in all outcome parameters (pain intensity, quality of sleep, neck disability and kinesiophobia) in the three groups post-intervention (p < 0.05). However, there was statistically significant difference between neck stabilization and Pilates exercises on pain intensity (p < 0.05).
The two groups (neck stabilization and Pilates) showed similar effect in the entire clinical outcomes aside pain intensity therefore both exercises are efficacious in the treatment of patients with NSCNP. However, neck stabilization exercises demonstrated a more superior effect than Pilates exercises in reducing pain intensity in patients with NSCNP.
颈部疼痛在给患者带来疼痛和功能障碍方面构成了巨大的医学挑战。据报道,治疗性运动是治疗慢性颈部疼痛患者的有效干预措施。
因此,本研究确定了颈部稳定训练和普拉提运动对非特异性慢性颈部疼痛患者的疼痛、睡眠障碍、颈部功能障碍和运动恐惧的影响。
45例非特异性慢性颈部疼痛(NSCNP)患者参与了本研究。他们通过计算机生成的数字被随机分为3组;颈部稳定训练组、普拉提运动组和颈部动态等长运动组。分别在基线、第4周(干预中期)和第8周(干预后)使用数字疼痛评分量表、失眠严重程度指数、颈部功能障碍指数、运动恐惧坦帕量表评估疼痛强度、睡眠障碍、颈部功能障碍、运动恐惧。使用描述性和推断性统计分析数据,显著性水平α≤0.05。
本研究结果显示,干预后三组的所有结局参数(疼痛强度、睡眠质量、颈部功能障碍和运动恐惧)均有改善(p<0.05)。然而,颈部稳定训练和普拉提运动在疼痛强度方面存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。
除疼痛强度外,两组(颈部稳定训练和普拉提)在整个临床结局方面显示出相似的效果,因此两种运动对NSCNP患者均有效。然而,在减轻NSCNP患者的疼痛强度方面,颈部稳定训练比普拉提运动显示出更优越的效果。