Heide Jan, Adam Thomas W, Jacobs Erik, Wolter Jan-Martin, Ehlert Sven, Walte Andreas, Zimmermann Ralf
Joint Mass Spectrometry Centre, Chair of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Joint Mass Spectrometry Centre, Cooperation Group "Comprehensive Molecular Analytics", Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Nov 5;23(12):2135-2144. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab091.
A wide array of alternative nicotine delivery devices (ANDD) has been developed and they are often described as less harmful than combustible cigarettes. This work compares the chemical emissions of three ANDD in comparison to cigarette smoke. All the tested ANDD are characterized by not involving combustion of tobacco.
Single-photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SPI-TOFMS) is coupled to a linear smoking machine, which allows a comprehensive, online analysis of the gaseous phase of the ANDD aerosol and the conventional cigarette (CC) smoke. The following devices were investigated in this study: a tobacco cigarette with a glowing piece of coal as a heating source, an electric device for heating tobacco, and a first-generation electronic cigarette. Data obtained from a standard 2R4F research cigarette are taken as a reference.
The puff-by-puff profile of all products was recorded. The ANDD show a substantial reduction or complete absence of known harmful and potentially harmful substances compared with the CC. In addition, tar substances (i.e. semivolatile and low volatile aromatic and phenolic compounds) are formed to a much lower extent. Nicotine, however, is supplied in comparable amounts except for the investigated electronic cigarette.
The data show that consumers switching from CC to ANDD are exposed to lower concentrations of harmful and potentially harmful substances. However, toxicological and epidemiological studies must deliver conclusive results if these reduced exposures are beneficial for users.
The comparison of puff-resolved profiles of emissions from different tobacco products, traditional and alternative, may help users switch to lower emission products. Puff-resolved comparison overcomes technical changes, use modes between products and may help in their regulation.
已开发出各种各样的替代尼古丁输送装置(ANDD),它们通常被描述为比可燃香烟危害更小。这项工作比较了三种ANDD与香烟烟雾的化学排放。所有测试的ANDD的特点是不涉及烟草燃烧。
单光子电离飞行时间质谱(SPI-TOFMS)与线性吸烟机联用,可对ANDD气溶胶和传统香烟(CC)烟雾的气相进行全面的在线分析。本研究调查了以下装置:以一块炽热煤为加热源的烟草香烟、加热烟草的电子装置和第一代电子烟。从标准2R4F研究香烟获得的数据用作参考。
记录了所有产品逐口抽吸的情况。与CC相比,ANDD显示出已知有害物质和潜在有害物质大幅减少或完全不存在。此外,焦油类物质(即半挥发性和低挥发性芳香族及酚类化合物)的形成程度要低得多。然而,除了所研究的电子烟外,尼古丁的供应量相当。
数据表明,从CC转向ANDD的消费者接触到的有害和潜在有害物质浓度较低。然而,如果这些减少的接触对使用者有益,毒理学和流行病学研究必须给出确凿的结果。
对不同烟草产品(传统产品和替代产品)排放的逐口抽吸情况进行比较,可能有助于使用者转向低排放产品。逐口抽吸情况的比较克服了产品之间的技术变化和使用模式差异,可能有助于对它们进行监管。