Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Updates Surg. 2021 Dec;73(6):2137-2143. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01061-z. Epub 2021 May 15.
As robotic surgery continues to disseminate into the field of colon and rectal surgery, there is a growing interest in the utilization of intracorporeal anastomosis to potentially improve surgical outcomes. The purpoe of this study was to compare feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of robotic sigmoid and low anterior resections performed with completely intracorporeal anastomosis (CICA) technique to the traditional extracorporeal assisted anastomosis (ECAA) technique. Consecutive series of patients who underwent elective robotic sigmoid or low anterior resections for benign or malignant disease utilizes either CICA or ECAA between August 2017 and November 2019. Surgical complications were assessed until 30 postoperative days and compared between the two groups. A total of 160 patients were identified; 73 (45.6%) in the CICA group and 87 (54.4%) in the ECAA group. Most of the procedures were performed for malignancy (76%). Estimated blood loss was lower in the CICA group (80.7 mL vs. 110.2 mL; p = 0.048), while operative times were longer (5.9 ± SD hours vs. 4.9 ± SD hours; p = < 0.001). Overall conversion rate was 1.9%, with no conversions in the CICA group. Overall complications occurred in 54 patients (33.8%) with 13 (8.3%) representing major complications. There were no significant differences in 30 day outcomes between the two groups. This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of robotic sigmoid and low anterior resections with CICA. Outcomes for robotic sigmoid and low anterior resections are encouraging regardless of anastomotic technique (CICA vs ECAA).
随着机器人手术在结肠和直肠外科领域的不断普及,人们对使用腔内吻合术来提高手术效果的兴趣日益浓厚。本研究旨在比较完全腔内吻合术(CICA)与传统的体外辅助吻合术(ECAA)在机器人乙状结肠和低位前切除术的可行性、安全性和短期结果。
2017 年 8 月至 2019 年 11 月,连续系列接受择期机器人乙状结肠或低位前切除术治疗良性或恶性疾病的患者,分别采用 CICA 或 ECAA 技术。评估两组患者的手术并发症,直到术后 30 天,并进行比较。共纳入 160 例患者,其中 CICA 组 73 例(45.6%),ECAA 组 87 例(54.4%)。大多数手术为恶性肿瘤(76%)。CICA 组的估计出血量较低(80.7ml 比 110.2ml;p=0.048),而手术时间较长(5.9±SD 小时比 4.9±SD 小时;p<0.001)。总的转换率为 1.9%,CICA 组无转换。总并发症发生在 54 例患者(33.8%),其中 13 例(8.3%)为主要并发症。两组患者 30 天结果无显著差异。
本研究表明,CICA 用于机器人乙状结肠和低位前切除术是可行和安全的。无论吻合技术(CICA 与 ECAA)如何,机器人乙状结肠和低位前切除术的结果都是令人鼓舞的。