Suppr超能文献

皮博迪个人成就测验阅读理解子测验施测中阅读与听读技术的比较:旁路法的依据

Comparison of reading and listening-reading techniques for administration of PIAT Reading Comprehension subtest: justification for the bypass approach.

作者信息

Weinberg W A, McLean A, Brumback R A

机构信息

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Childrens Medical Center, Dallas 75235.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1988 Apr;66(2):672-4. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.66.2.672.

Abstract

The Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT) Reading Comprehension subtest was administered to a group of 23 learning disabled children in Grades 5 through 7 who had been classified by the clinical Lexical Paradigm as good readers or poor readers. Using standardized test administration, 14 poor readers scored substantially below the 9 good readers; however, when the child was allowed to listen and read silently while the test item was read aloud, poor readers showed marked improvement in performance compared to only moderate improvement shown by the good readers. This difference in improvement between the groups was significant and resulted in poor readers achieving performance similar to that of the good readers administered the test in the standard manner.

摘要

对一组23名五至七年级的学习障碍儿童进行了皮博迪个人成就测验(PIAT)阅读理解子测验,这些儿童已被临床词汇范式分类为阅读能力强或阅读能力差的读者。采用标准化测试管理方式,14名阅读能力差的读者得分显著低于9名阅读能力强的读者;然而,当在朗读测试项目时允许儿童边听边默读时,阅读能力差的读者在表现上有显著提高,而阅读能力强的读者仅表现出适度提高。两组之间这种提高的差异是显著的,结果是阅读能力差的读者在表现上与以标准方式进行测试的阅读能力强的读者相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验