Spring C, French L
Department of Education, University of California, Davis 95616.
J Learn Disabil. 1990 Jan;23(1):53-8. doi: 10.1177/002221949002300112.
A method of identifying children with specific reading disabilities by identifying discrepancies between their reading and listening comprehension scores was validated with disabled and nondisabled readers in Grades 4, 5, and 6. The method is based on a modification of the reading comprehension subtest of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test (Dunn & Markwardt, 1970). In this modification, even-numbered sentences are read by subjects, and odd-numbered sentences are read by the test administrator as subjects listen. The features of this test that reduce demands on working memory, thereby making it suitable for the detection of a discrepancy between reading and listening comprehension in readers with disabilities, are discussed. A significant group-by-modality interaction was obtained. Children with reading disabilities scored significantly lower on reading than on listening comprehension, while nondisabled readers scored slightly higher, but not significantly so, on reading than on listening comprehension. The appropriateness of this method as a substitute for the traditional method, which is based on the detection of a discrepancy between intelligence and reading and which has recently been proscribed in certain school districts, is discussed. Issues concerning the listening comprehension skills of disabled readers are also discussed.
一种通过识别阅读和听力理解分数之间的差异来鉴别特定阅读障碍儿童的方法,在四年级、五年级和六年级的阅读障碍儿童和非阅读障碍儿童中得到了验证。该方法基于对皮博迪个人成就测验(邓恩和马克沃特,1970)阅读理解子测验的修改。在这种修改中,偶数句子由受试者阅读,奇数句子由测试管理员在受试者倾听时阅读。讨论了该测试的特点,这些特点减少了对工作记忆的要求,从而使其适合检测阅读障碍读者的阅读和听力理解之间的差异。获得了显著的组别×方式交互作用。阅读障碍儿童在阅读方面的得分显著低于听力理解,而非阅读障碍儿童在阅读方面的得分略高于听力理解,但差异不显著。讨论了这种方法作为传统方法替代品的适用性,传统方法基于检测智力和阅读之间的差异,最近在某些学区已被禁止。还讨论了与阅读障碍读者听力理解技能相关的问题。